ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2019
Differences between ICD-11 MMS and DSM-5 definition of premature ejaculation: a continuation of historical inadequacies and a source of serious misinterpretation by some European Regulatory Agencies (PART 2).
Review in International journal of impotence research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Management of premature ejaculation: a clinical guideline from the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS).Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2021Guideline
- Management and treatment variations in premature ejaculation: a nationwide survey by the Andrology Working Group of the Society of Urological Surgery in Turkey.International urology and nephrology · 2025Article
- Association of premature ejaculation with adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Relationship with digit ratio.Medicine · 2025Observational
- The Changes in ICD-11 Related to Sexual Health and Dysfunction and Their Implication for Clinical Practice.Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry · 2025Review
- Possible Pathophysiological Roles of Neurotransmitter Systems in Men With Lifelong Premature Ejaculation: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Current and emerging treatment options for premature ejaculation.Nature reviews. Urology · 2022Review
- Use of a confirmed mathematical method for back-analysis of IELT distributions: ejaculation time differences between two continents and between continents and men with lifelong premature ejaculation (Part 1).International journal of impotence research · 2019Article
- Men with subjective premature ejaculation have a similar lognormal IELT distribution as men in the general male population and differ mathematically from males with lifelong premature ejaculation after an IELT of 1.5 minutes (Part 2).International journal of impotence research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, the ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics (ICD-11-MMS, 2018 Version) has been published with a new definition of premature ejaculation (PE), including a third PE subtype. This definition differs from Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) definition of PE. We hereby address the similarities and differences between ICD-11-MMS and DSM-5 definition of PE and call attention to the illogical policy of some European (EU) National Regulatory Agencies to remain with a 1-min cut-off point of ejaculation time for Lifelong, Acquired and Subjective PE. The advantage of ICD-11-MMS is the inclusion of a third PE subtype, which is congruent with Subjective PE. A serious disadvantage of DSM-5 is that a 1-min criterion is used for both Lifelong and Acquired PE, and that a third PE subtype is not mentioned. Despite the incomplete DSM-5 definition of PE, some EU regulatory agencies adhere to a definition of PE which relies only on the 1-min ejaculation time cut-off point of DSM-5, and do not recognize the more recent PE definitions of ICD-11-MMS and International Society for Sexual Medicine. There is no scientific evidence for this illogical position. The continued use of a 1-min cut-off point for all subgroups of PE ignores the existence of Acquired PE (Intravaginal Ejaculation Latency Time (IELT) <3 min) and Subjective PE (IELT <approx. 6 min), both of which have been shown to be clinically and psychologically important. In conclusion, some EU regulatory agencies are not recognizing ongoing developments in the definition of three different subgroups of PE. We propose combining the DSM-5 and ICD-11 MMS definitions to optimize the whole PE spectrum for future registered drug treatment studies, so that it properly reflects patient needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30659291What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.