Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30659213›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Temporal trends and inequalities in coronary angiography utilization in the management of non-ST-Elevation acute coronary syndromes in the U.S.

Muhammad Rashid, David L Fischman, Martha Gulati, Khalid Tamman, Jessica Potts, Chun Shing Kwok, Joie Ensor, Ahmad Shoaib, Hossam Mansour, Azfar Zaman and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Improving Meta-analyses.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Arterial Thrombotic Complications of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Patient and Cardiologist Perspectives on Shared Decision Making in the Treatment of Older Adults Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Muhammad RashidKeele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Institutes of Applied Clinical Science and Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK. doctorrashid7@gmail.com.
David L FischmanDepartment of Medicine (Cardiology), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Martha GulatiDivision of Cardiology, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Khalid TammanDepartment of Cardiology, International medical centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Jessica PottsKeele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Institutes of Applied Clinical Science and Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Chun Shing KwokKeele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Institutes of Applied Clinical Science and Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7047-1586
Joie EnsorKeele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Institutes of Applied Clinical Science and Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Ahmad ShoaibKeele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Institutes of Applied Clinical Science and Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Hossam MansourDepartment of Cardiology, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt.
Azfar ZamanDepartment of Cardiology, Freeman Hospital and Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
Michael P SavageDepartment of Medicine (Cardiology), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Mamas A MamasKeele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Institutes of Applied Clinical Science and Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary angiography (CA) is the basis of an invasive management strategy in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS). There are limited contemporary data on national temporal trends in utilization of CA in different patient subgroups. We sought to investigate temporal trends, predictors and clinical outcomes associated with the use of CA in the US. Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2004-2014, we identified all inpatient admissions, age ≥18, with a primary diagnosis of NSTEACS. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate temporal trends, predictors and clinical outcomes associated with CA. From a total of 4,380,827 patients, 57.5% received CA during the study period and were more likely to be male, younger and less comorbid as defined per Charlson comorbidity index. The proportion of patients receiving CA increased from 48.5% to 68.5%, however, higher proportional increase was observed in males (53.9% to 69.4% P

Indexed as

Disease ManagementSocioeconomic FactorsAcute Coronary SyndromeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCoronary AngiographyFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProcedures and Techniques UtilizationSurvival AnalysisTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30659213
PMCPMC6338770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.