Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30658981›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2019

Sucrose Metabolism in Haloarchaea: Reassessment Using Genomics, Proteomics, and Metagenomics.

Timothy J Williams, Michelle A Allen, Yan Liao, Mark J Raftery, Ricardo Cavicchioli

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Timothy J WilliamsSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Michelle A AllenSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Yan LiaoSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Mark J RafteryBioanalytical Mass Spectrometry Facility, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ricardo CavicchioliSchool of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia r.cavicchioli@unsw.edu.au.
UNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The canonical pathway for sucrose metabolism in haloarchaea utilizes a modified Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas pathway (EMP), in which ketohexokinase and 1-phosphofructokinase phosphorylate fructose released from sucrose hydrolysis. However, our survey of haloarchaeal genomes determined that ketohexokinase and 1-phosphofructokinase genes were not present in all species known to utilize fructose and sucrose, thereby indicating that alternative mechanisms exist for fructose metabolism. A fructokinase gene was identified in the majority of fructose- and sucrose-utilizing species, whereas only a small number possessed a ketohexokinase gene. Analysis of a range of hypersaline metagenomes revealed that haloarchaeal fructokinase genes were far more abundant (37 times) than haloarchaeal ketohexokinase genes. We used proteomic analysis of

Indexed as

Archaeal ProteinsEuryarchaeotaFructokinasesGenome, ArchaealGenomicsGlycolysisMetagenomicsPhosphofructokinase-1PhosphorylationProteomicsSucrose1-phosphofructokinaseArchaeal ProteinsfructokinaseFructokinasesketohexokinasePhosphofructokinase-1Sucrosearchaea

Identifiers

PMID30658981
PMCPMC6414365
OpenAlexW2911081174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.