Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30658616›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

To what extent can the activities of the South Australian Health in All Policies initiative be linked to population health outcomes using a program theory-based evaluation?

Fran Baum, Toni Delany-Crowe, Colin MacDougall, Helen van Eyk, Angela Lawless, Carmel Williams, Michael Marmot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Forty Years of the Ottawa Charter. Why Healthy Public Policy Still Matters for Health Equity in Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. 'Health in All Policies'-A Key Driver for Health and Well-Being in a Post-COVID-19 Pandemic World.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Canada needs a "Health in All Policies" action plan now.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fran BaumSociety and Equity, Southgate Institute for Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, 5001, Australia. fran.baum@flinders.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2294-1368
Toni Delany-CroweSociety and Equity, Southgate Institute for Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
Colin MacDougallSociety and Equity, Southgate Institute for Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
Helen van EykSociety and Equity, Southgate Institute for Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
Angela LawlessCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
Carmel WilliamsHealth Determinants and Policy, SA Department for Health and Wellbeing, PO Box 6, Rundle Mall, Adelaide, 5000, Australia.
Michael MarmotDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.

Funding

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF INTRINSIC ACTIVATION OF FACTOR XF32HL007008 · NHLBI · SCRIPPS CLINIC AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI BURRI, BETTY J · 1985 to 1985
–
PREVENTIVE ONCOLOGY AWARDK07CA001647 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BONDY, MELISSA L · 1992 to 1996
–
British Heart Foundation RG/07/008/23674Medical Research Council G0100222Medical Research Council G0601647Medical Research Council G0701830Medical Research Council G0902037Medical Research Council G1000616Medical Research Council G19/35Medical Research Council G8802774National Health and Medical Research Council Grant number 1027561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper reports on a five-year study using a theory-based program logic evaluation, and supporting survey and interview data to examine the extent to which the activites of the South Australian Health in All Policies initiative can be linked to population health outcomes.

methodsMixed-methods data were collected between 2012 and 2016 in South Australia (144 semi-structured key informant interviews; two electronic surveys of public servants in 2013 (n = 435) and 2015 (n = 483); analysis of state government policy documents; and construction of a program logic model to shape assessment of the feasibility of attribution to population health outcomes).

resultsMultiple actions on social determinants of health in a range of state government sectors were reported and most could be linked through a program logic model to making some contribution to future population health outcomes. Context strongly influences implementation; not all initiatives will be successful and experimentation is vital. Successful initiatives included HiAP influencing the urban planning department to be more concerned with the health impacts of planning decisions, and encouraging the environment department to be concerned with the health impacts of its work.

conclusionsThe theory-based program logic suggests that SA HiAP facilitated improved population health through working with multiple government departments. Public servants came to appreciate how their sectors impact on health. Program logic is a mechanism to evaluate complex public health interventions in a way that takes account of political and economic contexts. SA HiAP was mainly successful in avoiding lifestyle drift in strategy. The initiative encouraged a range of state government departments to tackle conditions of daily living. The broader underpinning factors dictating the distribution of power, money and resources were not addressed by HiAP. This reflects HiAP's use of a consensus model which was driven by (rather than drove) state priorities and sought 'win-win' strategies.

Indexed as

Health PolicyState GovernmentHumansModels, TheoreticalPopulation HealthProgram EvaluationSouth AustraliaHealth in all policiesHealthy public policyIntersectoral actionSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID30658616
PMCPMC6339362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.