ReviewMicromachines2019
Progress in the Field of Micro-Electrocorticography.
Review in Micromachines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brain-Computer Interfaces: The Dawn of a New Era in Disease Treatment.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2026Review
- Review of Recent Advances in Implantable Brain-Computer Interfaces for the Restoration of Motor Function in Patients With Paralysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Review
- A Comb-Shaped Flexible Microelectrode Array for Simultaneous Multi-Scale Cortical Recording.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Smart Dura: a functional artificial dura for multi-modal neural recording and modulation.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
- Miniature endoscope for high resolution electrophysiological recordings from the colon of live mice.Nature communications · 2026Article
- The Application of an Ultra-Thin, High-Density μECoG Array in Dissecting Caffeine-Induced Cortical Dynamics in Mice.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Smart Dura: a functional artificial dura for multimodal neural recording and modulation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Electrophysiology of gliomas: current science, implications, and opportunities.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- In vivo microelectrode arrays for neuroscience.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025Article
- Materials and devices for high-density, high-throughput micro-electrocorticography arrays.Fundamental research · 2025Review
- Comparison metrics and power trade-offs for BCI motor decoding circuit design.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Review
- Comparison of Subdural and Intracortical Recordings of Somatosensory Evoked Responses.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Decrease in phase slip rates and phase cone structures during seizure evolution and epileptogenic activities derived from microgrid ECoG data.Current research in neurobiology · 2024Article
- State-of-the-Art on Brain-Computer Interface Technology.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Polymer nanofiber network reinforced gold electrode array for neural activity recording.Biomedical engineering letters · 2023Article
- A novel method for dynamically altering the surface area of intracranial EEG electrodes.Journal of neural engineering · 2023Article
- Review
- Applying antagonistic activation pattern to the single-trial classification of mental arithmetic.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Transparent, Low-Impedance Inkjet-Printed PEDOT:PSS Microelectrodes for Multi-modal Neuroscience.Physica status solidi. A, Applications and materials science : PSS · 2022Article
- Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-Based Neural Interfaces for Recording and Stimulation: Fundamental Aspects and In Vivo Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Since the 1940s electrocorticography (ECoG) devices and, more recently, in the last decade, micro-electrocorticography (µECoG) cortical electrode arrays were used for a wide set of experimental and clinical applications, such as epilepsy localization and brain⁻computer interface (BCI) technologies. Miniaturized implantable µECoG devices have the advantage of providing greater-density neural signal acquisition and stimulation capabilities in a minimally invasive fashion. An increased spatial resolution of the µECoG array will be useful for greater specificity diagnosis and treatment of neuronal diseases and the advancement of basic neuroscience and BCI research. In this review, recent achievements of ECoG and µECoG are discussed. The electrode configurations and varying material choices used to design µECoG arrays are discussed, including advantages and disadvantages of µECoG technology compared to electroencephalography (EEG), ECoG, and intracortical electrode arrays. Electrode materials that are the primary focus include platinum, iridium oxide, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT), indium tin oxide (ITO), and graphene. We discuss the biological immune response to µECoG devices compared to other electrode array types, the role of µECoG in clinical pathology, and brain⁻computer interface technology. The information presented in this review will be helpful to understand the current status, organize available knowledge, and guide future clinical and research applications of µECoG technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.