Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30658491›Full record

ReviewToxins2019

Toxin Neutralization Using Alternative Binding Proteins.

Timothy Patrick Jenkins, Thomas Fryer, Rasmus Ibsen Dehli, Jonas Arnold Jürgensen, Albert Fuglsang-Madsen, Sofie Føns, Andreas Hougaard Laustsen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Conserved Enzymatic Peptides inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Research square · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Towards better antivenoms: navigating the road to new types of snakebite envenoming therapies.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Recombinant antibodies against Iranian cobra venom as a new emerging therapy by phage display technology.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Value of Aptamers in Envenomation Cases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Timothy Patrick JenkinsDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0ES, UK. tpj24@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2979-5663
Thomas FryerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0ES, UK. tf275@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4338-0405
Rasmus Ibsen DehliDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark. rasdeh@dtu.dk.
Jonas Arnold JürgensenDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark. jjarnoldi@msn.com.
Albert Fuglsang-MadsenDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark. albertfuglsang@outlook.com.
Sofie FønsDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark. sofie.foens@gmail.com.
Andreas Hougaard LaustsenDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark. ahola@bio.dtu.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-6918-5574
Technical University of Denmark · DKUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal toxins present a major threat to human health worldwide, predominantly through snakebite envenomings, which are responsible for over 100,000 deaths each year. To date, the only available treatment against snakebite envenoming is plasma-derived antivenom. However, despite being key to limiting morbidity and mortality among snakebite victims, current antivenoms suffer from several drawbacks, such as immunogenicity and high cost of production. Consequently, avenues for improving envenoming therapy, such as the discovery of toxin-sequestering monoclonal antibodies against medically important target toxins through phage display selection, are being explored. However, alternative binding protein scaffolds that exhibit certain advantages compared to the well-known immunoglobulin G scaffold, including high stability under harsh conditions and low cost of production, may pose as possible low-cost alternatives to antibody-based therapeutics. There is now a plethora of alternative binding protein scaffolds, ranging from antibody derivatives (e.g., nanobodies), through rationally designed derivatives of other human proteins (e.g., DARPins), to derivatives of non-human proteins (e.g., affibodies), all exhibiting different biochemical and pharmacokinetic profiles. Undeniably, the high level of engineerability and potentially low cost of production, associated with many alternative protein scaffolds, present an exciting possibility for the future of snakebite therapeutics and merit thorough investigation. In this review, a comprehensive overview of the different types of binding protein scaffolds is provided together with a discussion on their relevance as potential modalities for use as next-generation antivenoms.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntitoxinsBites and StingsCarrier ProteinsHumansImmunization, PassiveToxins, BiologicalAntibodies, MonoclonalAntitoxinsCarrier ProteinsToxins, Biologicalalternative binding protein scaffoldsenvenoming therapynext-generation antivenomrecombinant binding proteinsSnakebite envenomingtoxin neutralizationvenom neutralization

Identifiers

PMID30658491
PMCPMC6356946
OpenAlexW2909836346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.