ReviewJournal of the National Cancer Institute2019
Survivorship Science at the NIH: Lessons Learned From Grants Funded in Fiscal Year 2016.
Review in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mapping Systematic Reviews of Breast Cancer Survivorship Interventions: A Network Analysis.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Loneliness and depression among older adults with cancer: an exploratory analysis of psychosocial constructs.Frontiers in aging · 2026Article
- Primary care for cancer survivors: a review of national institutes of health-funded grants 2017-2022.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Review
- Survivorship science at the National Institutes of Health 2017-2021.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024Article
- The HealthStreet Cancer Survivor Cohort: a Community Registry for Cancer Research.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024Article
- The built environment and cancer survivorship: A scoping review.Health & place · 2024Article
- The Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes cohort study: Design, baseline characteristics, and early outcomes.American journal of hematology · 2024Article
- Long-term late effects in older gastric cancer survivors: Survival analysis using Cox hazard regression model by retrospective electronic health records.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- Characterizing risky alcohol use, cigarette smoking, e-cigarette use, and physical inactivity among cancer survivors in the USA-a cross-sectional study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023Article
- Relative Burden of Cancer and Noncancer Mortality Among Long-Term Survivors of Breast, Prostate, and Colorectal Cancer in the US.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Job loss, return to work, and multidimensional well-being after breast cancer treatment in working-age Black and White women.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023Article
- A cancer survivorship model for holistic cancer care and research.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2023Article
- Article
- Large-scale North American cancer survivorship surveys: 2011-2019 update.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2022Review
- Improving cervical cancer survival-A multifaceted strategy to sustain progress for this global problem.Cancer · 2022Review
- Protocol paper: Multi-site, cluster-randomized clinical trial for optimizing functional outcomes of older cancer survivors after chemotherapy.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2022Article
- Defining research and infrastructure priorities for cancer survivorship in Australia: a modified Delphi study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
- Survivorship for Individuals Living With Advanced and Metastatic Cancers: National Cancer Institute Meeting Report.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022Article
- Real-World Evidence in Cardio-Oncology: What Is It and What Can It Tell Us?JACC. CardioOncology · 2022Article
- The Kaiser Permanente Research Bank Cancer Cohort: a collaborative resource to improve cancer care and survivorship.BMC cancer · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Federal investment in survivorship science has grown markedly since the National Cancer Institute's creation of the Office of Cancer Survivorship in 1996. To describe the nature of this research, provide a benchmark, and map new directions for the future, a portfolio analysis of National Institutes of Health-wide survivorship grants was undertaken for fiscal year 2016. Applying survivorship-relevant terms, a search was conducted using the National Institutes of Health Information for Management, Planning, Analysis and Coordination grants database. Grants identified were reviewed for inclusion and categorized by grant mechanism used, funding agency, and principal investigator characteristics. Trained pairs of coders classified each grant by focus and design (observational vs interventional), population studied, and outcomes examined. A total of 215 survivorship grants were identified; 7 were excluded for lack of fit and 2 for nonresearch focus. Forty-one (19.7%) representing training grants (n = 38) or conference grants (n = 3) were not coded. Of the remaining 165 grants, most (88.5%) were funded by the National Cancer Institute; used the large, investigator-initiated (R01) mechanism (66.7%); focused on adult survivors alone (84.2%), often breast cancer survivors (47.3%); were observational in nature (57.3%); and addressed a broad array of topics, including psychosocial and physiologic outcomes, health behaviors, patterns of care, and economic/employment outcomes. Grants were led by investigators from diverse backgrounds, 28.4% of whom were early in their career. Present funding patterns, many stable since 2006, point to the need to expand research to include different cancer sites, greater ethnoculturally diverse samples, and older (>65 years) as well as longer-term (>5 years) survivors and address effects of newer therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.