Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30657765›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of osteoarticular brucellosis.

Shakirat A Adetunji, Gilbert Ramirez, Margaret J Foster, Angela M Arenas-Gamboa

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Review
  11. Zoonotic infections of the Canadian Arctic.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The relationship betweenNorthern clinics of Istanbul · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shakirat A AdetunjiDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6045-5080
Gilbert RamirezSchool of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Margaret J FosterMedical Sciences Library, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4453-7788
Angela M Arenas-GamboaDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

Use of the goat model to test human Brucella vaccines in ArgentinaK01TW009981 · FIC · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI ARENAS, ANGELA M · 2014 to 2018
$670k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW009981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfection of bones and joints remains one of the most commonly described complications of brucellosis in humans and is predominantly reported in all ages and sexes in high-risk regions, such as the Middle East, Asia, South and Central America, and Africa. We aimed to systematically review the literature and perform a meta-analysis to estimate the global prevalence of osteoarticular brucellosis (OAB). METHODOLOGY: Major bibliographic databases were searched using keywords and suitable combinations. All studies reporting the incidence and clinical manifestations of osteoarticular brucellosis in humans, and demonstrated by two or more diagnostic methods (bacteriological, molecular, serological, and/or radiographic) were included. Random model was used, and statistical significance was set at 0.05. PRINCIPAL

findingsA total of 56 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. There was an evidence of geographical variation in the prevalence of osteoarticular disease with estimates ranging from 27% in low-risk regions to 36% in high-risk regions. However, the difference was not significant. Thus, brucellosis patients have at least a 27% chance of developing osteoarticular disease.

conclusionsThe prevalence of OAB is not dependent on the endemicity of brucellosis in a particular region. Hence, further research should investigate the potential mechanisms of OAB, as well as the influence of age, gender, and other socioeconomic factor variations in its global prevalence, as this may provide insight into associated exposure risks and management of the disease.

Indexed as

BrucellosisGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceOsteoarthritisPrevalenceRisk AssessmentTopography, Medical

Identifiers

PMID30657765
PMCPMC6355028
OpenAlexW2911007381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.