Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30657736›Full record

GuidelineJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2019

Revised Adult T-Cell Leukemia-Lymphoma International Consensus Meeting Report.

Lucy B Cook, Shigeo Fuji, Olivier Hermine, Ali Bazarbachi, Juan Carlos Ramos, Lee Ratner, Steve Horwitz, Paul Fields, Alina Tanase, Horia Bumbea and 22 more

Open access · greenAbstract readConsensus StatementPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 152 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
152citing papers in PubMed
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

152 citing papers in PubMed, 253 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

92 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 20 institutions in 8 countries.

Lucy B Cook1 Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service (NHS) Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Shigeo Fuji3 Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Olivier Hermine4 Necker University Hospital, Paris, France.
Ali Bazarbachi5 American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Juan Carlos Ramos6 University of Miami, Miami, FL.
Lee Ratner7 Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Steve Horwitz8 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Paul Fields9 Guys and St Thomas Hospital, Kings Health Partners, London, United Kingdom.
Alina Tanase10 Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.
Horia Bumbea11 Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Kate Cwynarski12 University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Graham Taylor2 Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Thomas A Waldmann13 National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Achilea Bittencourt14 Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Ambroise Marcais4 Necker University Hospital, Paris, France.
Felipe Suarez4 Necker University Hospital, Paris, France.
David Sibon4 Necker University Hospital, Paris, France.
Adrienne Phillips15 Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
Matthew Lunning16 University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE.
Reza Farid17 Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Yoshitaka Imaizumi18 Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Ilseung Choi19 National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takashi Ishida20 Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan.
Kenji Ishitsuka21 Kagoshima University Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
Takuya Fukushima22 University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.
Kaoru Uchimaru23 The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Akifumi Takaori-Kondo24 Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshiki Tokura25 Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Atae Utsunomiya26 Imamura General Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
Masao Matsuoka27 Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kunihiro Tsukasaki28 Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Toshiki Watanabe23 The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRImperial College London · GBThe University of Tokyo · JPAmerican University of Beirut · LBClinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · ROCornell University · USHamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPImamura Hospital · JPInstitutul Clinic Fundeni · ROIwate Medical University · JPKagoshima University Hospital · JPKings Health Partners · GBKumamoto University · JPKyoto University · JPMashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNagasaki University · JPNational Cancer Institute · USNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center · JPOsaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases · JP

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
IL-2:IL-15 : implications for cancer therapy (Investigator -Initiated Project)ZIASC004002 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI WALDMANN, THOMAS · 2009 to 2022
$22.9M
IMMUNE CHECKPOINT BLOCKADE PROMOTES ADULT T CELL LEUKEMIAR21CA234640 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI RATNER, LEE · 2019 to 2020
$375k
Department of HealthNCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R21 CA234640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL) is a distinct mature T-cell malignancy caused by chronic infection with human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 with diverse clinical features and prognosis. ATL remains a challenging disease as a result of its diverse clinical features, multidrug resistance of malignant cells, frequent large tumor burden, hypercalcemia, and/or frequent opportunistic infection. In 2009, we published a consensus report to define prognostic factors, clinical subclassifications, treatment strategies, and response criteria. The 2009 consensus report has become the standard reference for clinical trials in ATL and a guide for clinical management. Since the last consensus there has been progress in the understanding of the molecular pathophysiology of ATL and risk-adapted treatment approaches.

methodsReflecting these advances, ATL researchers and clinicians joined together at the 18th International Conference on Human Retrovirology-Human T-Lymphotropic Virus and Related Retroviruses-in Tokyo, Japan, March, 2017, to review evidence for current clinical practice and to update the consensus with a new focus on the subtype classification of cutaneous ATL, CNS lesions in aggressive ATL, management of elderly or transplantation-ineligible patients, and treatment strategies that incorporate up-front allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation and novel agents.

resultsAs a result of lower-quality clinical evidence, a best practice approach was adopted and consensus statements agreed on by coauthors (> 90% agreement).

conclusionThis expert consensus highlights the need for additional clinical trials to develop novel standard therapies for the treatment of ATL.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAntineoplastic AgentsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsConsensusHumansHuman T-lymphotropic virus 1Leukemia-Lymphoma, Adult T-CellMedical OncologyRisk FactorsSkin NeoplasmsTransplantation, HomologousTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID30657736
PMCPMC6494249
OpenAlexW2909144857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.