Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30657537›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

Association of Infants Exposed to Prenatal Zika Virus Infection With Their Clinical, Neurologic, and Developmental Status Evaluated via the General Movement Assessment Tool.

Christa Einspieler, Fabiana Utsch, Patricia Brasil, Carolina Y Panvequio Aizawa, Colleen Peyton, Renata Hydee Hasue, Fernanda Françoso Genovesi, Luana Damasceno, Maria Elisabeth Moreira, Kristina Adachi and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
31.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Health surveillance and development of children with congenital Zika Virus syndrome: an integrative literature review.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Christa EinspielerInterdisciplinary Developmental Neuroscience-iDN, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Fabiana UtschRede SARAH de Hospitais de Reabilitação, Reabilitação Infantil, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Patricia BrasilLaboratorio de Doenças Febris Agudas, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas (INI), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Carolina Y Panvequio AizawaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Communication Sciences & Disorders, and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Colleen PeytonDepartment of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Science, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Renata Hydee HasueDepartment of Physical Therapy, Communication Sciences & Disorders, and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernanda Françoso GenovesiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Communication Sciences & Disorders, and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luana DamascenoLaboratorio de Doenças Febris Agudas, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas (INI), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Maria Elisabeth MoreiraDepartment of Pediatrics, Instituto Fernandes Figueira, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Kristina AdachiDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
Peter B MarschikInterdisciplinary Developmental Neuroscience-iDN, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Karin Nielsen-SainesDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.
GM Zika Working Group
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USMedical University of Graz · ATUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Genetic evolution, pathogenesis and immune responses in mother to child transmission of ZIKVR01AI140718 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CHENG, GENHONG, JUNG, JAE U · 2018 to 2022
$3.8M
Viral kinetics, immunity and transmission of ZIKV: an exploratory analysis in preparation for vaccine developmentR21AI129534 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BRASIL, PATRICIA, NIELSEN, KARIN · 2017 to 2018
$378k
Opthalmic Manifestations of Congenital Zika Virus InfectionR21EY028318 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BRASIL, PATRICIA, NIELSEN, KARIN · 2017 to 2018
$373k
NEI NIH HHS R21 EY028318NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI140718NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI129534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There is an urgent need to assess neurodevelopment in Zika virus (ZIKV)-exposed infants. Objectives: To perform general movement assessment (GMA) at 9 to 20 weeks' postterm age and to evaluate whether the findings are associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes at age 12 months in infants prenatally exposed to acute maternal illness with rash in Brazil during the ZIKV outbreak and in age-matched controls. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, infants prenatally exposed to acute maternal illness with rash were recruited at medical institutions in Rio de Janeiro and Belo Horizonte, Brazil, from February 1, 2016, to April 30, 2017, while infants without any exposure to maternal illness originated from the Graz University Audiovisual Research Database for the Interdisciplinary Analysis of Neurodevelopment. Participants were 444 infants, including 76 infants without congenital microcephaly, 35 infants with microcephaly, and 333 neurotypical children matched for sex, gestational age at birth, and age at GMA. Main Outcomes and Measures: General movement assessment performed at 9 to 20 weeks' postterm age, with negative predictive value, positive predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity generated, as well as clinical, neurologic, and developmental status (Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition [Bayley-III] scores) at age 12 months. Motor Optimality Scores were generated based on the overall quality of the motor repertoire. Adverse outcomes were defined as a Bayley-III score less than 2 SD in at least 1 domain, a score less than 1 SD in at least 2 domains, and/or atypical neurologic findings. Results: A total of 444 infants were enrolled, including 111 children prenatally exposed to a maternal illness with rash and 333 children without any prenatal exposure to maternal illness (57.7% male and mean [SD] age, 14 [2] weeks for both groups); 82.1% (46 of 56) of ZIKV-exposed infants without congenital microcephaly were healthy at age 12 months. Forty-four of 46 infants were correctly identified by GMA at 3 months, with a negative predictive value of 94% (95% CI, 85%-97%). Seven of 10 ZIKV-exposed children without microcephaly with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes were identified by GMA. The GMA positive predictive value was 78% (95% CI, 46%-94%), sensitivity was 70% (95% CI, 35%-93%), specificity was 96% (95% CI, 85%-99%), and accuracy was 91% (95% CI, 80%-97%). Children with microcephaly had bilateral spastic cerebral palsy; none had normal movements. The Motor Optimality Score differentiated outcomes: the median Motor Optimality Score was 23 (interquartile range [IQR], 21-26) in children with normal development, 12 (IQR, 8-19) in children with adverse outcomes, and 5 (IQR, 5-6) in children with microcephaly, a significant difference (P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that although a large proportion of ZIKV-exposed infants without microcephaly develop normally, many do not. The GMA should be incorporated into routine infant assessments to enable early entry into targeted treatment programs.

Indexed as

Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsBrazilChild DevelopmentDevelopmental DisabilitiesDisease OutbreaksFemaleHumansInfantInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMaleMicrocephalyMovementNeurologic ExaminationPhysical ExaminationPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID30657537
PMCPMC6431234
OpenAlexW2908614721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.