Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30657395›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2017

Decentralized Learning Framework of Meta-Survival Analysis for Developing Robust Prognostic Signatures.

Yi Cui, Bailiang Li, Ruijiang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yi CuiYi Cui, Bailiang Li, and Ruijiang Li, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Yi Cui, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Bailiang LiYi Cui, Bailiang Li, and Ruijiang Li, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Yi Cui, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Ruijiang LiYi Cui, Bailiang Li, and Ruijiang Li, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Yi Cui, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.

Funding

MRI-Based Radiation Therapy Treatment PlanningR01CA193730 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LI, RUIJIANG · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA193730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA significant hurdle in developing reliable gene expression-based prognostic models has been the limited sample size, which can cause overfitting and false discovery. Combining data from multiple studies can enhance statistical power and reduce spurious findings, but how to address the biologic heterogeneity across different datasets remains a major challenge. Better meta-survival analysis approaches are needed. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe presented a decentralized learning framework for meta-survival analysis without the need for data aggregation. Our method consisted of a series of proposals that together alleviated the influence of data heterogeneity and improved the performance of survival prediction. First, we transformed the gene expression profile of every sample into normalized percentile ranks to obtain platform-agnostic features. Second, we used Stouffer's meta-z approach in combination with Harrell's concordance index to prioritize and select genes to be included in the model. Third, we used survival discordance as a scale-independent model loss function. Instead of generating a merged dataset and training the model therein, we avoided comparing patients across datasets and individually evaluated the loss function on each dataset. Finally, we optimized the model by minimizing the joint loss function.

resultsThrough comprehensive evaluation on 31 public microarray datasets containing 6,724 samples of several cancer types, we demonstrated that the proposed method has outperformed (1) single prognostic genes identified using conventional meta-analysis, (2) multigene signatures trained on single datasets, (3) multigene signatures trained on merged datasets as well as by other existing meta-analysis methods, and (4) clinically applicable, established multigene signatures.

conclusionThe decentralized learning approach can be used to effectively perform meta-analysis of gene expression data and to develop robust multigene prognostic signatures.

Indexed as

Medical OncologyAlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicNeoplasmsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsSurvival AnalysisBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID30657395
PMCPMC6873986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.