ArticleClinical and translational science2019
Access to Routinely Collected Clinical Data for Research: A Process Implemented at an Academic Medical Center.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors affecting the collection of clinical data for quality improvement at a tertiary centre in Papua New Guinea: a qualitative study.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Academia and industry in the age of artificial intelligence: a narrative review.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Review
- What is the patient re-identification risk from using de-identified clinical free text data for health research?AI and ethics · 2025Review
- Confidence-based laboratory test reduction recommendation algorithm.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Closing the loop: automatically identifying abnormal imaging results in scanned documents.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Exploring the Hazards of Scaling Up Clinical Data Analyses: A Drug Side Effect Discovery Case Report.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational ScienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electronic health records are valuable for clinical and translational research. Institutions must protect patient privacy and comply with applicable regulations while allowing appropriate access to clinical data for research. The processes that investigators must follow to access clinical data can be substantially different at different institutions. In this paper, we describe the process developed at our institution that has been active for 5 years and was used to satisfy over 200 requests for access to identified clinical data, usually within 1 day for internal requests and 3 days for visiting researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.