Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30656642›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental immunology2019

Immunogenicity assay development and validation for biological therapy as exemplified by ustekinumab.

S Mojtahed Poor, T Ulshöfer, L A Gabriel, M Henke, M Köhm, F Behrens, G Geisslinger, M J Parnham, H Burkhardt, S Schiffmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Immunogenicity of biologic agents in rheumatology.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

S Mojtahed PoorDivision of Rheumatology, Goethe-University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
T UlshöferFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Branch for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology TMP, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
L A GabrielFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Branch for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology TMP, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
M HenkeFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Branch for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology TMP, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
M KöhmDivision of Rheumatology, Goethe-University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
F BehrensDivision of Rheumatology, Goethe-University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
G GeisslingerPharmazentrum Frankfurt/ZAFES, Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Goethe-University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
M J ParnhamFraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Branch for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology TMP, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
H BurkhardtDivision of Rheumatology, Goethe-University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
S SchiffmannPharmazentrum Frankfurt/ZAFES, Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Goethe-University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5035-2504
Institute of Molecular Biology · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DEFraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction of biotherapeutics has been a major milestone in the treatment of different chronic diseases. Nevertheless, the immune system can recognize the administered biological as non-self and respond with generation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA), including neutralizing ADA (nADA). Immunogenic responses may result in altered drug dynamics and kinetics leading to changes in safety and efficacy. However, there are several challenges with standard techniques for immunogenicity testing. Ustekinumab (UST), used in different inflammatory diseases, is a therapeutic antibody directed against the shared p40 subunit of interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23, interfering in the pathogenically crucial T helper type 1 (Th1)/Th17 pathway. We established and validated different approaches for detection and quantitation of UST, UST-specific ADA and nADA. Addressing the obstacle of complex formation of UST with nADA, we developed an acidification assay to approach the total amount of nADA. Validated methods were based on surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy (SPR), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a cell-based approach to characterize neutralizing capacity of nADA. Parameters assessed were determination and quantitation limits, linearity, range, precision, accuracy and selectivity. Quantitation of ADA and UST was feasible at lower concentrations using ELISA, whereas SPR showed a wider linear range for determination of ADA and UST. Accuracy, precision and linearity for quantitation were comparable using ELISA, SPR and the cell-based approach. All validated parameters fulfill the requirements of regulatory agencies. A combination of the testing approaches could address the increasing demand of precision medicine as it can be suitable for capturing the whole spectrum of immunogenicity and is transferable to other biologicals.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibody FormationAntibody SpecificityBiological ProductsBiological TherapyEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansImmunoassaySurface Plasmon ResonanceUstekinumabAntibodies, MonoclonalBiological ProductsUstekinumabassay validationcell-based assayELISAneutralizing anti-drug antibodysurface plasmon resonanceustekinumab

Identifiers

PMID30656642
PMCPMC6468185
OpenAlexW2910033161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.