Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30656613›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2019

Association of anthropometric status, perceived stress, and personality traits with eating behavior in university students.

Kumiko Ohara, Tomoki Mase, Katsuyasu Kouda, Chiemi Miyawaki, Katsumasa Momoi, Tomoko Fujitani, Yuki Fujita, Harunobu Nakamura

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Body-Size Perception among First-Generation Chinese Migrants in Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kumiko OharaGraduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan. ohara@person.kobe-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0411-9821
Tomoki MaseFaculty of Human Development and Education, Kyoto Women's University, Kyoto, Japan.
Katsuyasu KoudaDepartment of Hygiene and Public Health, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan.
Chiemi MiyawakiResearch Field in Education, Education, Law, Economics and the Humanities Area, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.
Katsumasa MomoiFaculty of Health and Welfare, Tokushima Bunri University, Tokushima, Japan.
Tomoko FujitaniGraduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Yuki FujitaDepartment of Public Health, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Harunobu NakamuraGraduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 13J02216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe investigated the association of anthropometric status, perceived stress, and personality traits with eating behavior in university students.

methodsThe participants, 1546 Japanese university students (964 males, 582 females), completed a questionnaire which asked for their current height and weight, ideal height and weight, eating behaviors, perceived stress, and personality traits.

resultsRestrained eating was higher in normal-weight participants compared with underweight participants in both males and females (p < 0.001, both males and females). Restrained eating in normal-weight males was significantly lower in normal-weight females (p < 0.001). In addition, normal-weight males reported less stress than normal-weight females (anxiety/uncertainty, p = 0.037; tiredness/physical responses, p < 0.001; autonomic symptoms, p < 0.001; depression/feeling, p < 0.001) and underweight males (tiredness/physical responses, p = 0.018; autonomic symptoms, p = 0.001). Moreover, among normal-weight males, neuroticism was significantly lower compared with normal-weight females (p < 0.001). In multiple regression analysis, male participants revealed positive association between restrained eating and body mass index (β = 0.199, p < 0.001) or body mass index difference (β = - 0.170, p = 0.001). In contrast, female revealed more significant associations between emotional and external eating and perceived stress or personality traits compared with males.

conclusionsThese results indicate that associations between eating behavior and anthropometric status or psychological factors are different by each eating behavior, which is partly influenced by gender difference. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, cross-sectional descriptive study.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnthropometryBody Mass IndexBody WeightCross-Sectional StudiesEmotionsFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMalePersonalityPersonality AssessmentStress, PsychologicalStudentsUniversitiesYoung AdultAnthropometric statusEating behaviorGender differencePersonalityStressStudents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.