Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30656602›Full record

Trial reportCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2019

Acceptance versus reappraisal: Behavioral, autonomic, and neural effects.

Philippe R Goldin, Craig A Moodie, James J Gross

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02036658 nacompletednot on this map

fMRI of Emotion Regulation During RCT of CBT vs. MBSR for Social Anxiety Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2011 to 2015Enrolled108ConditionsSocial Anxiety DisorderArmsCognitive Behavioral Group Therapy, Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction
NCT04001140 naunknown statusnot on this map

Enhancement of Emotion Regulation Skills in Vulnerable Adolescents at Risk for Addictions and Psychopathology Due to Risk Factors in the Family

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CyprusRan2018 to 2020Enrolled100ConditionsEmotional Problem, Behavior ProblemArmsEnhancement of emotion regulation skills
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. The impact of emotion regulation strategies on experiential and physiological responses to negative emotional videos.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Philippe R GoldinUniversity of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA. philippegoldin@gmail.com.
Craig A MoodieStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
James J GrossStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

fMRI of Emotional Reactivity, Cognitive Regulation, and CBT for Social PhobiaR01MH076074 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GROSS, JAMES J · 2006 to 2010
$2.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH076074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotion regulation (ER) is an important skill for well-being. Cognitive reappraisal is a goal-oriented cognitive change strategy. Acceptance involves decentering from immediate habits of reactivity, observing moment-to-moment shifts in thoughts, emotions, and sensations. These two regulation strategies are thought to have different effects on emotion; however, no study has examined the differential effects of reappraisal and acceptance on behavioral, autonomic, and brain responses in the context of ideographic personally salient negative self-beliefs. Thirty-five right-handed, healthy adults were presented idiographic negative self-beliefs embedded in autobiographical scripts. We measured negative emotion ratings, autonomic psychophysiology, and functional magnetic resonance imaging blood oxygen-level dependent responses while participants read neutral statements, reacted to their own negative self-beliefs, and implemented reappraisal and acceptance strategies. Compared with react, reappraisal resulted in significantly lesser negative emotion and respiration rate; no differences in heart rate and skin conductance level; greater brain responses implicated in cognitive control, language, and social cognition; and lesser amygdala responses. Compared with react, acceptance resulted in significantly lesser negative emotion, respiration rate, and heart rate; no difference in skin conductance level; and greater brain responses in networks implicated in cognitive control and attention. Compared with acceptance, reappraisal resulted in significantly lesser negative emotion; no difference in respiration rate and skin conductance level; higher heart rate; greater brain responses in brain regions implicated in cognitive control; and lesser brain responses in amygdala. Reappraisal is more effective than acceptance in down-regulating negative emotion, but may require greater recruitment of autonomic, cognitive, and brain resources. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02036658.

Indexed as

AdultAffectAmygdalaAttentionAutonomic Nervous SystemCerebral CortexEmotional RegulationExecutive FunctionFemaleGalvanic Skin ResponseHeart RateHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory, EpisodicMiddle AgedAcceptanceEmotion regulationfMRIMindful attentionNeuroimagingReappraisal

Identifiers

PMID30656602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.