Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30656584›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019

Static decontamination of oil-based drill cuttings with pressurized hot water using response surface methodology.

Zhong Chen, Dongyuan Li, Kun Tong, Zeliang Chen, Hongzhen Chen, Qiao Chen, Yuanjian Xu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Design of Highly Efficient COMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhong ChenState Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control, Beijing, 102206, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7632-9361
Dongyuan LiSchool of Petroleum Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, 610500, China.
Kun TongState Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control, Beijing, 102206, China.
Zeliang ChenKey Laboratory of Reservoir Aquatic Environment, Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing, 400714, China.
Hongzhen ChenKey Laboratory of Reservoir Aquatic Environment, Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing, 400714, China.
Qiao ChenKey Laboratory of Reservoir Aquatic Environment, Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing, 400714, China.
Yuanjian XuKey Laboratory of Reservoir Aquatic Environment, Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing, 400714, China. xuyuanjian@cigit.ac.cn.
China University of Petroleum, Beijing · CNChongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology · CNSouthwest Petroleum University · CN

Funding

Chongqing Basic and Frontier Research Projects CSTC2015JCYJBX0120Chongqing City Social Undertakings and Livelihood Protection Science and Technology Innovation Special Project CSTC2017SHMSA120001Chongqing Land Bureau Science and Technology Planning Project CQGT-KJ-2017026, CQGT-KJ-2014037Open Project Program of the State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control PPC2016001the West Young Scholar Project of the Chinese Academy ofSciences --
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Separating organic pollutants from oil-based drill cuttings (OBDC) is the current trend for its safe disposal. In this study, pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE) was adapted to decontaminate OBDC for the first time. Two typical OBDC samples, i.e., diesel-based drill cuttings (OBDC-A) and white oil-based drill cuttings (OBDC-B), were statically extracted in a homemade batch autoclave. Response surface methodology (RSM) with a central composite design (CCD) was applied to investigate the effects and interactive effects of three independent operating parameters (temperature, extraction time, and water volume) and to ultimately optimize the PHWE process. The results suggested that temperature is the dominant parameter, followed by water volume and extraction time. Interactive effects among the three parameters are present in the PHWE of OBDC-A but absent in the PHWE of OBDC-B. The suitable conditions for the effective PHWE of OBDC-A were found to be a temperature of 284-300 °C, water volume of 15-35 ml, and extraction time of 20-60 min. The corresponding conditions were 237-300 °C, 15-35 ml, and 20-60 min for the PHWE of OBDC-B. These different phenomena are caused by the different characteristics of the two OBDC samples. All of the polynomial models obtained from the RSM experiments are very valid and can adequately describe the relationship among the three independent operating parameters and responses. The experimental results also confirmed that PHWE is a more efficient separation technique for decontaminating OBDC than single organic solvent extraction or low-temperature thermal desorption because PHWE integrates the advantages of both these processes.

Indexed as

DecontaminationEnvironmental PollutantsEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationHot TemperatureOil and Gas IndustrySolventsWaterEnvironmental PollutantsSolventsWaterHazardous solid wasteOily sludgePetroleum contaminationShale gasWaste drill fluids

Identifiers

PMID30656584
OpenAlexW2909738614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.