ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2019
Infectious diseases physician attitudes to long-term antibiotic use.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Why we do what we do: a survey of ID providers about oral antibiotics.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
- Self-reported knowledge attitude and practice of healthcare professionals in the management of infection and antimicrobial stewardship: a systematic review.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025Review
- Economic evaluation: immunoglobulin vs prophylactic antibiotics in hypogammaglobulinemia and hematological malignancies.Blood advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background In Australia, it is not known how much antibiotic prescribing by infectious diseases physicians is long-term, or how confident they are with the evidence behind this practice. Objective Survey Australian infectious diseases physicians to assess attitudes and prescribing practice prescribing prolonged courses of antibiotics. Methods An online questionnaire was distributed to the mailing group for the Australian Society of Infectious Diseases. Responses were collected from 29th October to 12th November 2015. Results The majority of respondents practiced in Australia as Infectious Diseases physicians, microbiologists, or trainees. 88% had prescribed long-term antibiotics. Heterogeneity was noted in the indications for prescription, including recurrent UTIs, cellulitis or chest infections, prosthetic joint infection and vascular graft infection. Beta-lactams antibiotics were prescribed most frequently. 22% of respondents had prescribed rifampicin/fusidic acid most frequently, while 11% could not identify a single antibiotic that they used most frequently, due to the heterogeneity of indications for prescribing. 95% stated that they would stop long-term antibiotic therapy if appropriate, and 74% were willing to enrol their patients into a randomised control trial looking at stopping long-term therapy. Conclusion Most infectious diseases physicians who responded to the survey prescribe long-term antibiotics, with great heterogeneity in the indications for which these antibiotics are prescribed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.