Trial reportJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2019
Usefulness of combining clinical and biochemical parameters for prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications after lung resection surgery.
Trial report in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02168751 (STUDY OF PULMONARY AND SYSTEMIC INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE SECONDARY TO LUNG RESECTION SURGERY USING INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA VERSUS INHALATION ANESTHESIA WITH HALOGENATED AGENTS), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study of pulmonary and systemic inflammatory response secondary to lung resection surgery using intravenous anesthesia versus inhalation anesthesia with halogenated agents
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Comparative analysis of short-term outcomes, inflammatory markers, and complications in robotic-assistedJournal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- A machine learning-based predictive model for postoperative pulmonary complications in lung cancer and its SHAP interpretation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Association of mechanical power during one-lung ventilation and post-operative pulmonary complications among patients undergoing lobectomy: a protocol for a prospective cohort study.Updates in surgery · 2023Article
- Preoperative controlling nutritional status score (CONUT) predicts postoperative complications of patients with bronchiectasis after lung resections.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Incidence and Associations of Acute Kidney Injury after General Thoracic Surgery: A System Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2018-2019 end of year summary: respiration.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2020Review
- Clinical guidelines on perioperative management strategies for enhanced recovery after lung surgery.Translational lung cancer research · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early detection of patients with a high risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) could improve postoperative strategies. We investigated the role of monitoring systemic and lung inflammatory biomarkers during surgery and the early postoperative period to detect patients at high risk of PPCs after lung resection surgery (LRS). This is a substudy of a randomized control trial on the inflammatory effects of anaesthetic drugs during LRS. We classified patients into two groups, depending on whether or not they developed PPCs. We constructed three multivariate logistic regression models to analyse the power of the biomarkers to predict PPCs. Model 1 only included the usual clinical variables; Model 2 included lung and systemic inflammatory biomarkers; and Model 3 combined Models 1 and 2. Comparisons between mathematical models were based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and tests of integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. PPCs were detected in 37 (21.3%) patients during admission. The AUROC for Models 1, 2, and 3 was 0.79 (95% CI 0.71-0.87), 0.80 (95% CI 0.72-0.88), and 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.97), respectively. Comparison of the AUROC between Models 1 and 2 did not reveal statistically significant values (p = 0.79). However, Model 3 was superior to Model 1 (p < 0.001). Model 3 had had an IDI of 0.29 (p < 0.001) and a net reclassification index of 0.28 (p = 0.007). A mathematical model combining inflammation biomarkers with clinical variables predicts PPCs after LRS better than a model that includes only clinical data. Clinical registration number Clinical Trial Registration NCT02168751; EudraCT 2011-002294-29.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30656507What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.