Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30656473›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2019

Inflammatory responses after vitrectomy with vitreous substitutes in a rabbit model.

Henrik Barth, Sven Crafoord, Karin Arnér, Fredrik Ghosh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Reducing Postoperative Needling in XEN63Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The therapeutic effect of Healaflow in glaucoma surgery.American journal of translational research · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Henrik BarthDepartment of Ophthalmology, Lund University, BMC D10, 22184, Lund, Sweden. henrik.barth@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4702-0626
Sven CrafoordDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro University Hospital, Orebro, Sweden.
Karin ArnérDepartment of Ophthalmology, Lund University, BMC D10, 22184, Lund, Sweden.
Fredrik GhoshDepartment of Ophthalmology, Lund University, BMC D10, 22184, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SEÖrebro University Hospital · SE

Funding

Vetenskapsr?det 90247201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the inflammatory response of current and future potential vitreous substitutes in an experimental in vivo vitrectomy model.

methodsTwenty-five gauge pars plana vitrectomy was performed in the right eye of 60 pigmented rabbits, with subsequent injection of 0.5-1.0 ml of Healaflow® (cross-linked hyaluronic acid, n = 12), Bio-Alcamid® (polyalkylimide, n = 8), silicone oil (n = 12), or balanced saline solution (BSS, n = 28). Postoperative clinical evaluation was performed; and the rabbits were sacrificed at 1 day, 1 week, or 1 month. The eyecups were then examined macroscopically; the retinas sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Htx), and immunohistochemically labeled for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), CD45, galectin-3, CD68, and CD20. Unoperated left eyes from treated animals as well as eyes from untreated animals were used as controls.

resultsVitrectomy without major complications was achieved in 46/60 eyes. The remaining 14 eyes were analyzed separately. One eye developed endophthalmitis after 1 week and was excluded. Eyes treated with Healaflow®, silicone oil, and BSS had a comparable appearance macroscopically and in Htx-stained sections, whereas Bio-Alcamid®-injected eyes exhibited increased macroscopic inflammation and severely affected retinas. GFAP upregulation was present in all treatment groups, most prominent in eyes treated with Bio-Alcamid® and silicone oil. Upregulation of CD45 and CD68 in the inner retina and vitreous space was most prominent with Bio-Alcamid® treatment, and these eyes together with their silicone oil-treated counterparts also displayed a stronger upregulation of CD20-labeled cells compared with remaining groups. General upregulation of galectin-3, mainly in the inner retina, was found in all groups. In eyes with perioperative complications, labeling of CD45, CD68, and especially GFAP was comparably high.

conclusionsWe here describe differences in the postsurgery inflammatory profiles of existing and potential vitreous substitutes. Bio-Alcamid® and silicone oil display severe signs of gliosis and inflammation, whereas Healaflow® elicits minimal reactions comparable with BSS, highlighting its potential application as a vitreous substitute in a future clinical setting.

Indexed as

Acrylic ResinsHyaluronic AcidSilicone OilsVitreous BodyAcetatesAnimalsAntigens, CDArtificial OrgansBiocompatible MaterialsDrug CombinationsEndophthalmitisEndotamponadeGalectin 3Glial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinInflammationMineralsAcetatesAcrylic ResinsAntigens, CDBio-AlcamidBiocompatible MaterialsBSS solutionDrug CombinationsGalectin 3Glial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHyaluronic AcidMineralsSilicone OilsSodium ChlorideHyaluronic acidHydrogelMethodsVitreoretinal surgeryVitreousVitreous substitute

Identifiers

PMID30656473
OpenAlexW2909676509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.