Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30656470›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2019

Identification of abnormalities in the lumbar nerve tract using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance neurography.

Hiroaki Manabe, Toshinori Sakai, Ryo Miyagi, Fumitake Tezuka, Kazuta Yamashita, Yoichiro Takata, Koichi Sairyo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroaki ManabeDepartment of Orthopedics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
Toshinori SakaiDepartment of Orthopedics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan. norinoridowluck@yahoo.co.jp.
Ryo MiyagiDepartment of Orthopedics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
Fumitake TezukaDepartment of Orthopedics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
Kazuta YamashitaDepartment of Orthopedics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
Yoichiro TakataDepartment of Orthopedics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
Koichi SairyoDepartment of Orthopedics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
Tokushima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAbnormalities of the lumbar nerve tract caused by congenital variations or high nerve root take-off angles are difficult to visualize. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance neurography (DW-MRN) has recently been introduced for imaging of the lumbosacral region. The aims of this study were to identify lumbar nerve tract abnormalities caused by congenital variation or a high nerve root take-off angle using DW-MRN and to assess the diagnostic value of this imaging modality.

methodsA total of 573 magnetic resonance images from 575 patients (261 men, 314 women; mean age 58.5 years) with low back/leg pain were retrospectively analyzed. We classified congenital variations in the lumbar nerve roots using the Neidre and MacNab criteria and investigated nerve roots with a take-off angle of 60° or more. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Congenital variations were identified in 8 patients (9 nerve roots, 1.6%). The most commonly identified variation was in the sacral nerve root (n = 5) followed by the L4 (n = 3) and L5 (n = 1) nerve roots. All variations identified were on the left side. There were 3 cases of type 1a variation, 1 of type 1b, 1 of type 2, and 4 of type 3. In total, 210 (36.6%) of the magnetic resonance images showed high nerve root take-off angles at the intervertebral foramen that was caused by disk herniation, spondylolisthesis, or osteophytes with degeneration. Patients with high nerve root take-off angles were significantly older than those without (P < 0.05). These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGanglia, SpinalHumansLow Back PainLumbosacral RegionMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingRetrospective StudiesSpinal Nerve RootsDiffusion-weighted magnetic resonance neurographyLumbar nerveMRINerve root anomaly

Identifiers

PMID30656470
OpenAlexW2910239421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.