ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2019
[Cardiovascular comorbidities in rheumatoid arthritis].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential response of tissue engineered skeletal muscle from rheumatoid arthritis patients and healthy controls.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Glycoprotein Acetyls Is a Novel Biomarker Predicting Cardiovascular Complications in Rheumatoid Arthritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- The Influence of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis on the Occurrence of Arterial Hypertension: An 8-Year Prospective Clinical Observational Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- The Involvement of Glucose and Lipid Metabolism Alteration in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Its Clinical Implication.Journal of inflammation research · 2023Review
- The importance of homocysteine in the development of cardiovascular complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Reumatologia · 2020Review
- [Comorbidities-Their role in the treat to target concept for rheumatoid arthritis].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Approximately 80% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) suffer from comorbidities including more than 50% from cardiovascular (CV) diseases. Inflammatory activity is the main factor connecting RA with atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, stroke, thromboembolic events and heart failure. Altogether these affect RA patients twice as frequently as the general population and CV events are the major cause of death in RA. Besides inflammatory activity, which can be reduced or eliminated by optimal treatment and controlling the RA activity, traditional CV risk factors also contribute to the total CV risk. These risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes and hyperlipidemia can also be found more frequently in RA patients but often remain undetected and untreated for a long time. Reducing this deficit means improvement of the life expectancy for RA patients, which has been demonstrated in studies by treatment of hyperlipoproteinemia. Among the drugs used for RA treatment non-steroidal antirheumatic drugs and glucocorticoids increase the CV risk if used in the long term. Hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate and biologics on the other hand are able to dramatically reduce the risk. Elevated CV risks of inflammatory rheumatic diseases are widely unknown in primary care. Therefore, the rheumatologist should be responsible for assessment of risk factors but in real life motivation to do so is relatively low. Some studies could demonstrate that using nursing-based standardized assessment is an excellent opportunity to reduce these deficits. Depending on the individual risk reassessment should take place every 1-5 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30656399What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.