Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30656390›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2019

Segment 2/3 Hypertrophy is Greater When Right Portal Vein Embolisation is Extended to Segment 4 in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Christopher J Hammond, Saadat Ali, Hafizul Haq, Lorna Luo, Judith I Wyatt, Giles J Toogood, J Peter A Lodge, Jai V Patel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. SURGICAL TECHNIQUES TO INCREASE RESECTABILITY IN LIVER METASTASIS.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2025
    Review
  3. New trends in surgery for colorectal liver metastasis.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher J HammondDepartment of Vascular Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Great George Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK. christopherhammond@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9435-5678
Saadat AliUniversity of Leeds Medical School, Leeds, UK.
Hafizul HaqUniversity of Leeds Medical School, Leeds, UK.
Lorna LuoUniversity of Leeds Medical School, Leeds, UK.
Judith I WyattDepartment of Pathology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Giles J ToogoodDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
J Peter A LodgeDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Jai V PatelDepartment of Vascular Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Great George Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK.
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM), right portal vein embolisation (RPVE) is used to increase the volume of the future remnant liver (FRL) before major hepatic resection. It is not established whether embolisation of segment 4 in addition RPVE (RPVE + 4) induces greater hypertrophy of the FRL. Limitations of prior studies include heterogenous populations and use of hypertrophy metrics sensitive to baseline variables.

methodsFrom 2010 to 2015, consecutive patients undergoing RPVE or RPVE + 4 for CRLM, who had not undergone prior major hepatic resection and in whom imaging was available, were included in a retrospective study. Data were extracted from hospital electronic records. Volumetric assessments of segments 2-3 were made on cross-sectional imaging before and after embolisation and corrected for standardised liver volume.

resultsNinety-nine patients underwent PVE, and 60 met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-eight patients underwent RPVE, and 22 underwent RPVE + 4. Forty-five patients had undergone median 6 cycles of prior chemotherapy. Eighteen patients had FRL metastases at PVE, and 16 had undergone subsegmental metastasectomy in the FRL. Assessments of the degree of hypertrophy (DH) of segments 2/3 were made at median 35 (interquartile range 30-49) days after PVE. RPVE + 4 resulted in a significantly greater increase in DH than RPVE (7.7 ± 1.8% vs 11.3 ± 2.6%, p = 0.011). No confounding association between baseline variables and the decision to undertake RPVE or RPVE + 4 was identified. Median survival was 2.4 years and was not influenced by segment 4 embolisation.

conclusionRPVE + 4 results in greater DH of segments 2/3 than RPVE in people with CLRM.

Indexed as

Portal VeinAgedCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsEmbolization, TherapeuticFemaleHumansHypertrophyLiverLiver NeoplasmsMaleRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeColorectal liver metastasisFuture remnant liverHepatectomyLiver regenerationPortal veinTherapeutic embolisation

Identifiers

PMID30656390
PMCPMC6394476
OpenAlexW2909586320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.