Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30656361›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2019

Underestimation of pelvic organ prolapse in the supine straining position, based on magnetic resonance imaging findings.

Anique T M Grob, Judith Olde Heuvel, Jurgen J Futterer, Diana Massop, Angelique L Veenstra van Nieuwenhoven, Frank F J Simonis, Carl H van der Vaart

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Effect of Pessary Insertion on Pelvic Anatomy: A Prospective Observational Study Using Upright MRI.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The influence of sacrocolporectopexy on pelvic anatomy assessed in an upright position using MRI.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anique T M GrobMultiModality Medical Imaging (M3i), Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Carre Building, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB, Enschede, The Netherlands. a.t.m.grob@utwente.nl.
Judith Olde HeuvelMagnetic Detection and Imaging (MD&I), Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Jurgen J FuttererRobotics and Mechatronics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Diana MassopDepartment of Gynaecology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Angelique L Veenstra van NieuwenhovenDepartment of Gynaecology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Frank F J SimonisMagnetic Detection and Imaging (MD&I), Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Carl H van der VaartDepartment of Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University of Twente · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLZiekenhuis Groep Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePelvic organ prolapse (POP) is clinically diagnosed in the supine position, where the effect of gravity is simulated by having the patients put strain on their pelvic floor. The objective of this study was to determine the degree of POP underestimation in the supine position based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings.

methodsThis prospective study was conducted with symptomatic POP grade ≥ 2 patients. Fifteen female patients were examined with an MRI system that allows supine and upright imaging. The differences between supine and upright in distances of the bladder neck, cervix, and pouch of Douglas from the pubococcygeal line (PCL) were estimated, together with changes in the genital hiatal area. Patients were scanned at rest and during straining. All distances were compared using the Wilcoxon ranking test.

resultsAll mean distances from the PCL increased from the supine-strain to the upright-rest and from the supine-strain to the upright-strain position. These distances were found in the supine and upright positions: the bladder descended 1.3 cm to 1.4 cm, the cervix 1.1 cm to 2.2 cm, and the pouch of Douglas 0.8 cm to 1.5 cm respectively (all p values <0.05). The hiatal area was larger in the upright-strain position (mean 42.0 cm

conclusionUpright MRI scanning of patients with POP grade ≥ 2 both at rest and during straining shows a significantly larger extent of the prolapse than that observed during supine straining.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPatient PositioningPelvic Organ ProlapseProspective StudiesSupine PositionExtentProlapsePubococcygeal lineStrainUpright MRI

Identifiers

PMID30656361
PMCPMC6834735
OpenAlexW2906978197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.