ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2019
Efficient genetic value prediction using incomplete omics data.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of genomic prediction capabilities of transcriptome data in a barley multi-parent RIL population.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
- Genomic selection: Essence, applications, and prospects.The plant genome · 2025Review
- Optimizing selection based on BLUPs or BLUEs in multiple sets of genotypes differing in their population parameters.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024Article
- Incorporating Omics Data in Genomic Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Multi-omics-based prediction of hybrid performance in canola.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021Article
- Merging Genomics and Transcriptomics for Predicting Fusarium Head Blight Resistance in Wheat.Genes · 2021Article
- Single-step genomic prediction of fruit-quality traits using phenotypic records of non-genotyped relatives in citrus.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
key messageCovering a subset of individuals with a quantitative predictor, while imputing records for all others using pedigree or genomic data, could improve the precision of predictions while controlling for costs. Predicting genetic values with high accuracy is pivotal for effective candidate selection in animal and plant breeding. Novel 'omics'-based predictors have been shown to improve upon established genome-based predictions of important complex traits but require laborious and expensive assays. As a consequence, there are various datasets with full genetic marker coverage of all studied individuals but incomplete coverage with other 'omics' data. In animal breeding, single-step prediction was introduced to efficiently combine pedigree information, collected on a large number of animals, with genomic information, collected on a smaller subset of animals, for breeding value estimation without bias. Using two maize datasets of inbred lines and hybrids, we show that the single-step framework facilitates imputing transcriptomic data, boosting forecasts when their predictive ability exceeds that of pedigree or genomic data. Our results suggest that covering only a subset of inbred lines with 'omics' predictors and imputing all others using pedigree or genomic data could enable breeders to improve trait predictions while keeping costs under control. Employing 'omics' predictors could particularly improve candidate selection in hybrid breeding because the success of forecasts is a strongly convex function of predictive ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30656353What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.