Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30656279›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2019

Barriers to integrating direct oral anticoagulants into anticoagulation clinic care: A mixed-methods study.

Geoffrey D Barnes, Jennifer Acosta, Christopher Graves, Eric Puroll, Eva Kline-Rogers, Xiaokui Gu, Kevin Townsend, Ellen McMahon, Terri Craig, James B Froehlich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Optimization of DOAC management services in a centralized anticoagulation clinic.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Geoffrey D BarnesMichigan Clinical Outcomes Research and Reporting Program University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-6532-8440
Jennifer AcostaCenter for Bioethics and Social Science in Medicine University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan.
Christopher GravesMichigan Clinical Outcomes Research and Reporting Program University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan.
Eric PurollMichigan Clinical Outcomes Research and Reporting Program University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan.
Eva Kline-RogersMichigan Clinical Outcomes Research and Reporting Program University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan.
Xiaokui GuMichigan Clinical Outcomes Research and Reporting Program University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan.
Kevin TownsendUS Medical Affairs Pfizer Ann Arbor Michigan.
Ellen McMahonUS Medical Affairs Pfizer Ann Arbor Michigan.
Terri CraigUS Medical Affairs Pfizer Ann Arbor Michigan.
James B FroehlichMichigan Clinical Outcomes Research and Reporting Program University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan.
University of Michigan · USPfizer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOutpatient anticoagulation clinics were initially developed to care for patients taking vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin. There has not been a systematic evaluation of the barriers and facilitators to integrating direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) care into outpatient anticoagulation clinics.

methodsWe performed a mixed methods study consisting of an online survey of anticoagulation clinic providers and semi-structured interviews with anticoagulation clinic leaders and managers between March and May of 2017. Interviews were transcribed and coded, exploring for themes around barriers and facilitators to DOAC care within anticoagulation clinics. Survey questions pertaining to the specific themes identified in the interviews were analyzed using summary statistics.

resultsSurvey responses were collected from 159 unique anticoagulation clinics and 20 semi-structured interviews were conducted. Three primary barriers to DOAC care in the anticoagulation clinic were described by the interviewees: (a) a lack of provider awareness for ongoing monitoring and services provided by the anticoagulation clinic; (b) financial challenges to providing care to DOAC patients in an anticoagulation clinic model; and (c) clinical knowledge versus scope of care by the anticoagulation staff. These themes linked to three key areas of variation, including: (a) the size and hospital affiliation of the anticoagulation clinic; (b) the use of face-to-face versus telephone-based care; and (c) the use of nurses or pharmacists in the anticoagulation clinic.

conclusionsAnticoagulation clinics in the United States experience important barriers to integrating DOAC care. These barriers vary based on the clinic size, model for warfarin care, and staff credentials (nursing or pharmacy).

Indexed as

anticoagulantsantithrombinsfactor Xa inhibitorshealth care surveysqualitative researchwarfarin

Identifiers

PMID30656279
PMCPMC6332808
OpenAlexW2896361064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.