Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30656276›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2019

Circulating endothelial cells as biomarker for cardiovascular diseases.

Maura Farinacci, Thomas Krahn, Wilfried Dinh, Hans-Dieter Volk, Hans-Dirk Düngen, Josephine Wagner, Timo Konen, Oliver von Ahsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Plasma NOTCH3 and the risk of cardiovascular recurrence in patients with ischemic stroke.QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Markers of Endothelial Dysfunction in Kawasaki Disease: An Update.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Maura FarinacciInstitute for Medical Immunology Charité University of Medicine Berlin Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2422-2818
Thomas KrahnBiomarker Research Bayer AG Berlin Germany.
Wilfried DinhDrug Discovery Clinical Sciences Experimental Medicine Bayer AG Wuppertal Germany.
Hans-Dieter VolkInstitute for Medical Immunology Charité University of Medicine Berlin Germany.
Hans-Dirk DüngenMedical Department Division of Cardiology Charité University of Medicine Berlin Germany.
Josephine WagnerMedical Department Division of Cardiology Charité University of Medicine Berlin Germany.
Timo KonenDepartment of NanoBiophotonics Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry Gottingen Germany.
Oliver von AhsenBiomarker Research Bayer AG Berlin Germany.
Bayer (Germany) · DEBerlin-Brandenburger Centrum für Regenerative Therapien · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHelios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal · DEMax Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndothelial dysfunction is involved in several cardiovascular diseases. Elevated levels of circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and low levels of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have been described in different cardiovascular conditions, suggesting their potential use as diagnostic biomarkers for endothelial dysfunction. Compared to typical peripheral blood leukocyte subsets, CECs and EPCs occur at very low frequency. The reliable identification and characterization of CECs and EPCs is a prerequisite for their clinical use, however, a validated method to this purpose is still missing but a key for rare cell events.

objectivesTo establish a validated flow cytometric procedure in order to quantify CECs and EPCs in human whole blood.

methodsIn the establishment phase, the assay sensitivity, robustness, and the sample storage conditions were optimized as prerequisite for clinical use. In a second phase, CECs and EPCs were analyzed in heart failure with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction, in arterial hypertension (aHT), and in diabetic nephropathy (DN) in comparison to age-matched healthy controls.

resultsThe quantification procedure for CECs and EPCs showed high sensitivity and reproducibility. CEC values resulted significantly increased in patients with DN and HFpEF in comparison to healthy controls. CEC quantification showed a diagnostic sensitivity of 90% and a sensitivity of 68.0%, 70.4%, and 66.7% for DN, HFpEF, and aHT, respectively.

conclusionA robust and precise assay to quantify CECs and EPCs in pre-clinical and clinical studies has been established. CEC counts resulted to be a good diagnostic biomarker for DN and HFpEF.

Indexed as

biomarkerscardiovascular diseasesendothelial cellsendothelial progenitor cellsflow cytometry

Identifiers

PMID30656276
PMCPMC6332781
OpenAlexW2898565675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.