Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30656261›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2018

Orthopaedic Surgeon Communication Skills: Perception of Empathy and Patient Satisfaction Through the Use of Anatomic Models.

Edwin L Portalatín, Luis F Carrazana, Roberto Colon, Ricardo Abreu, Dennys Rivera, Luis Lojo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edwin L PortalatínDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Portalatín, Dr. Carrazana, Dr. Colon, and Dr. Lojo), University of Puerto Rico, Medical Science Campus, and the Orthopaedic Department, University of Puerto Rico, Medical Science Campus (Dr. Abreu and Rivera), San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Luis F CarrazanaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Portalatín, Dr. Carrazana, Dr. Colon, and Dr. Lojo), University of Puerto Rico, Medical Science Campus, and the Orthopaedic Department, University of Puerto Rico, Medical Science Campus (Dr. Abreu and Rivera), San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Roberto ColonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Portalatín, Dr. Carrazana, Dr. Colon, and Dr. Lojo), University of Puerto Rico, Medical Science Campus, and the Orthopaedic Department, University of Puerto Rico, Medical Science Campus (Dr. Abreu and Rivera), San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Ricardo AbreuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Portalatín, Dr. Carrazana, Dr. Colon, and Dr. Lojo), University of Puerto Rico, Medical Science Campus, and the Orthopaedic Department, University of Puerto Rico, Medical Science Campus (Dr. Abreu and Rivera), San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Dennys RiveraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Portalatín, Dr. Carrazana, Dr. Colon, and Dr. Lojo), University of Puerto Rico, Medical Science Campus, and the Orthopaedic Department, University of Puerto Rico, Medical Science Campus (Dr. Abreu and Rivera), San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Luis LojoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Portalatín, Dr. Carrazana, Dr. Colon, and Dr. Lojo), University of Puerto Rico, Medical Science Campus, and the Orthopaedic Department, University of Puerto Rico, Medical Science Campus (Dr. Abreu and Rivera), San Juan, Puerto Rico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatient satisfaction is an increasingly emphasized measure of patient-centered care and important component of reimbursement programs. Orthopaedic surgeons are regarded as low-empathy surgeons. Our goals were to understand the role of anatomic models during the orthopaedic appointment and how their use can affect patient satisfaction and perceived empathy.

methodsNew patients at an outpatient clinic were asked to participate in a postencounter questionnaire to asses empathy perception (n = 304). Clinic days were randomly assigned to use anatomic models during the encounter to assist with clinical information transmission. The instrument provided contained Consultation and Relational Empathy questionnaire (ie, a person-centered process that was developed to measure empathy in the context of the therapeutic relationship during a one-on-one consultation between a clinician and a patient).

resultsA total of 304 participants were included in the study. Analyses of the sociodemographic characteristics did not reveal any significant difference between the control and experimental groups. Consultation and Relational Empathy scores for the nonanatomic group (46.0 ± 9.0) and anatomic group (48.0 ± 7.7) were not statistically different ( DISCUSSION: The use of anatomic models during initial orthopaedic encounter did not improve perceived empathy and satisfaction scores in our study. Longer encounter time in the orthopaedic appointment does not mean higher empathy perception.

conclusionOrthopaedic surgeons have the duty to find new strategies to improve communication with the patient. Better communication has been associated with better patient satisfaction. Further investigation should be considered to use other strategies to provide better care for our patients.

Identifiers

PMID30656261
PMCPMC6324897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.