Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30656169›Full record

ArticleJournal of exercise rehabilitation2018

Comparison of the effects of stability exercise and balance exercise on muscle activity in female patients with chronic low back pain.

Dae-Hyun Kim, Tae-Ho Kim

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exercise rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05888051 (Age-related Differences on Low Back Pain and Lower Extremity Isokinetic Muscle Strength and Balance), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05888051 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Age-related Differences on Low Back Pain and Lower Extremity Isokinetic Muscle Strength and Balance

TypeobservationalSponsorIstanbul Medipol University HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled110ConditionsBack Pain
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dae-Hyun KimDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Science, Daegu University, Gyeongsan, Korea.
Tae-Ho KimDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Science, Daegu University, Gyeongsan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7939-2139
Daegu University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stability exercise (SE) and balance exercise (BE) are generally-applied clinical interventions for back pain. For a proper clinical application, it is necessary to characterize and compare the effects of SE and BE on low back pain (LBP). The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of SE and BE on the activity of trunk muscles in women with chronic LBP. Women with chronic LBP (n=30) who volunteered for this study were randomly divided into two exercise groups of 15 participants. We obtained pre- and postintervention data through application of the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and electromyography (EMG). While post-intervention EMG showed decreased activity of the external oblique (EO) in the SE group, the EMG results in the BE group showed increased EO activity (

Indexed as

Balance exerciseElectromyographyFemale patientsLow back painStability exerciseTrunk muscle activity

Identifiers

PMID30656169
PMCPMC6323339
OpenAlexW2907423278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.