ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2019
A lung cancer research agenda that reflects the diverse perspectives of community stakeholders: process and outcomes of the SEED method.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mixed methods systematic review of consumer engagement in rural health practice, research, and education.Health promotion international · 2025Pooled it
- Addressing opioid misuse through community-engaged strategy development: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Review
- Impacting Community Well-Being Through Effective Engagement Using the SEED Method.Journal of extension · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a Participatory Action Project to Address Opioid Misuse: Breaking Down Barriers Through Partnership Processes.Gateways : international journal of community research & engagement · 2024Article
- Bringing Lived Experience to Research on Health and Homelessness: Perspectives of Researchers and Lived Experience Partners.Community mental health journal · 2023Article
- Patient and public involvement in cancer research: A scoping review.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- A rural community's perspective on the causes of and solutions to the opioid crisis in southern Virginia: a qualitative study.Rural and remote health · 2022Article
- A Guide to Selecting Participatory Research Methods Based on Project and Partnership Goals.Journal of participatory research methods · 2022Article
- Nursing and Allied Health Research Priorities in the Care of Patients With Thoracic Malignancies: An International Cross-Sectional Survey.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Participatory Action Planning to Address the Opioid Crisis in a Rural Virginia Community Using the SEED Method.Journal of participatory research methods · 2020Article
- Parenting Science Gang: radical co-creation of research projects led by parents of young children.Research involvement and engagement · 2020Article
- Patient and carer involvement in palliative care research: An integrative qualitative evidence synthesis review.Palliative medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
plain english summaryThere is a need for methods that engage lay people and other stakeholders, such as patients and healthcare providers, in developing research questions about health issues important to them and their communities. Involving stakeholders helps ensure that funding goes to research that addresses their concerns. The SEED Method engages stakeholders in a systematic process to explore health issues and develop research questions. Diverse groups of stakeholders participate at three levels: as collaborators that lead the process throughout, as participants who use their expertise to develop the questions, and as consultants who provide additional perspectives about the health topic. We used the SEED Method to engage 61 stakeholders from different socioeconomic and professional backgrounds to create research questions on lung cancer outcomes. Participants included cancer patients and caregivers, healthcare providers and administrators, and policymakers from a rural Virginia community. They developed causal models that diagrammed factors that influence lung cancer outcomes and the relationships between them. They used these models to develop priority research questions. The questions reflect the participants' diverse perspectives and address different areas of inquiry related to lung cancer outcomes, including access to care, support systems, social determinants of health, and quality of care. Participants felt well prepared to perform the project tasks because they had the opportunity to review lung cancer information, receive causal model and research question development training, and participate in facilitated group activities. The SEED Method can be used in a variety of settings and applied to any health topic of interest to stakeholders. ABSTRACT:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.