Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30656063›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2019

A lung cancer research agenda that reflects the diverse perspectives of community stakeholders: process and outcomes of the SEED method.

Carlin L Rafie, Emily B Zimmerman, Dawn E Moser, Sarah Cook, Fatemeh Zarghami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carlin L Rafie1Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 321 Wallace Hall (0430), 295 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1402-5650
Emily B Zimmerman2Center on Society and Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, 830 East Main St., Suite 5032, P.O. Box 980212, Richmond, Virginia 23298-0159 USA.
Dawn E MoserMartinsville, Virginia 24112 USA.
Sarah Cook4Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Ave, Nashville, TN 37203 USA.
Fatemeh Zarghami1Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 321 Wallace Hall (0430), 295 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 USA.

Funding

Research Supplement to Promote Diversity in Health Related ResearchUL1TR002649 · NCATS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MOELLER, FREDERICK GERARD · 2018 to 2022
$19.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002649Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute ME-1310-07664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

plain english summaryThere is a need for methods that engage lay people and other stakeholders, such as patients and healthcare providers, in developing research questions about health issues important to them and their communities. Involving stakeholders helps ensure that funding goes to research that addresses their concerns. The SEED Method engages stakeholders in a systematic process to explore health issues and develop research questions. Diverse groups of stakeholders participate at three levels: as collaborators that lead the process throughout, as participants who use their expertise to develop the questions, and as consultants who provide additional perspectives about the health topic. We used the SEED Method to engage 61 stakeholders from different socioeconomic and professional backgrounds to create research questions on lung cancer outcomes. Participants included cancer patients and caregivers, healthcare providers and administrators, and policymakers from a rural Virginia community. They developed causal models that diagrammed factors that influence lung cancer outcomes and the relationships between them. They used these models to develop priority research questions. The questions reflect the participants' diverse perspectives and address different areas of inquiry related to lung cancer outcomes, including access to care, support systems, social determinants of health, and quality of care. Participants felt well prepared to perform the project tasks because they had the opportunity to review lung cancer information, receive causal model and research question development training, and participate in facilitated group activities. The SEED Method can be used in a variety of settings and applied to any health topic of interest to stakeholders. ABSTRACT:

Indexed as

Community based participatory researchResearch question developmentStakeholder engagement

Identifiers

PMID30656063
PMCPMC6330432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.