ArticleOncology letters2019
Treatment package time predicts cancer-specific survival and distant metastasis in laryngeal cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Treatment package time (TPT) and surgery to post-operative radiotherapy (S-PORT) interval in head and neck cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Standardized Diagnostic Workup and Patient-Centered Decision Making for Surgery and Neck Dissection Followed by Risk-Factor Adapted Adjuvant Therapy Improve Loco-Regional Control in Local Advanced Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Association between treatment package time and clinical predictors in oropharyngeal cancer.Medicine · 2020Observational
- Missed radiation therapy sessions in first three weeks predict distant metastasis and less favorable outcomes in surgically treated patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated whether treatment package time was significantly associated with survival outcomes of resectable locally-advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma in patients who consecutively underwent various treatments, including surgery alone and salvage surgery for residual tumor. A total of 100 patients with clinical T3-T4 resectable laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled in this study. The treatment package time was calculated in days between the start of any treatment and the end of all treatments, including postoperative radiotherapy and salvage surgery for residual tumors. Using a log-rank test, a treatment package time of ≥68 days showed significantly shorter cancer-specific (P=0.0013) and distant metastasis-free survival (P=0.0017), compared with a treatment package time of <68 days. Multivariate survival analyses of two Cox's hazards proportional models was conducted. In both model-1, which adjusted for cT3/cT4, cN0-1/cN2-3 and total laryngectomy/non-total laryngectomy, and model-2, which adjusted for cT3/cT4, cN0-1/cN2-3 and induction therapy/non-induction therapy, the cancer-specific survival and distant metastasis-free survival, according to treatment package time, were significantly longer with <68 days compared with ≥68 days (P<0.01). The present study demonstrated that a prolonged treatment package time is a prognostic factor for shorter cancer-specific and distant metastasis-free survival after various treatments for resectable locally-advanced laryngeal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.