Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30655808›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2019

Ki-67 index value and progesterone receptor status can predict prognosis and suitable treatment in node-negative breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative tumors.

Nobuyuki Arima, Reiki Nishimura, Tomofumi Osako, Yasuhiro Okumura, Masahiro Nakano, Mamiko Fujisue, Yasuyuki Nishiyama, Yasuo Toyozumi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nobuyuki ArimaDepartment of Pathology, Kumamoto Shinto General Hospital, Kumamoto 862-8655, Japan.
Reiki NishimuraDepartment of Breast Oncology, Kumamoto Shinto General Hospital, Kumamoto 862-8655, Japan.
Tomofumi OsakoDepartment of Breast Oncology, Kumamoto Shinto General Hospital, Kumamoto 862-8655, Japan.
Yasuhiro OkumuraDepartment of Breast Oncology, Kumamoto Shinto General Hospital, Kumamoto 862-8655, Japan.
Masahiro NakanoDepartment of Breast Oncology, Kumamoto Shinto General Hospital, Kumamoto 862-8655, Japan.
Mamiko FujisueDepartment of Breast Oncology, Kumamoto Shinto General Hospital, Kumamoto 862-8655, Japan.
Yasuyuki NishiyamaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fukuoka Wajiro Hospital, Fukuoka 811-0213, Japan.
Yasuo ToyozumiDepartment of Pathology, Kumamoto City Hospital, Kumamoto 862-8505, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene profiling has identified at least 4 breast cancer subtypes, including Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-enriched and basal-like, and immunohistochemistry is used as a guide to determine these subtypes. In the present study, patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative and negative nodes were classified into 4 groups according to the PgR and the Ki-67 status and were retrospectively examined. The analysis was based on the clinicopathological findings, and includes the recurrence score (RS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates. Patients with invasive breast cancer (n=1866) were classified as LA (high PgR/low Ki-67), LB-1 (high PgR/high Ki-67), LB-2 (low PgR/high Ki-67), and LB-3 (low PgR/low Ki-67). In addition, 41 of the cases underwent a 21-gene expression assay. The data revealed that T1 tumors were more prevalent in the LA group and rare in the LB-2 group. Furthermore, nuclear grade 3 and p53 overexpression was revealed to be significantly correlated with LB-2. In terms of prognosis, LA had a significantly more favorable DFS; however, no differences were observed in the LB-3 group. LB-2 had a significantly worse DFS in all cases, and in the cases administered with endocrine therapy alone. Chemotherapy in combination with endocrine therapy was administered to cases with a higher risk of recurrence. In the LB-2 group, there was no difference in the DFS rates between the cases with endocrine therapy and chemo-endocrine therapy. These findings suggest that chemotherapy could improve the DFS in the LB-2 group. In addition, the majority of cases with LA, LB-3 and LB-1 had a RS of ≤25 and the majority of the LB-2 cases had a RS of >25. The patients with LA and LB-3 had a favorable DFS even in the group that received endocrine therapy alone. LB-2 was significantly correlated with a higher degree of malignancy and benefited from chemotherapy. These data suggest that the PgR and the Ki-67 status are effective in predicting prognosis, and for deciding on the most effective treatment strategy in patients with breast cancer.

Indexed as

breast cancer subtypechemotherapyearly-stage breast cancerendocrine therapyestrogen receptor-positivegene expression assaysKi-67progesterone receptor

Identifiers

PMID30655808
PMCPMC6313203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.