Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30655729›Full record

ArticleReproductive medicine and biology2019

The timing of cumulus cell removal for intracytoplasmic sperm injection influences the capability of embryonic development.

Satoshi Mizuno, Yuko Ishikawa, Hiroshi Matsumoto, Manabu Sato, Mamoru Ida, Aisaku Fukuda, Yoshiharu Morimoto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive medicine and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Satoshi MizunoIVF Osaka Clinic Osaka Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3275-204X
Yuko IshikawaHORAC Grand Front Osaka Clinic Osaka Japan.
Hiroshi MatsumotoIVF Osaka Clinic Osaka Japan.
Manabu SatoIVF Namba Clinic Osaka Japan.
Mamoru IdaIVF Osaka Clinic Osaka Japan.
Aisaku FukudaIVF Osaka Clinic Osaka Japan.
Yoshiharu MorimotoHORAC Grand Front Osaka Clinic Osaka Japan.
Osaka Nishi Clinic · JPFutaba clinic · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether the presence of intact cumulus cells during the preincubation period for ICSI should be considered as a critical factor in fertilization and embryonic development.

methodsThe cohort of this prospective randomized study was limited to infertile women younger than 39 years of age who underwent controlled ovarian stimulation for ICSI between October 2013 and May 2015 and whose embryos were to be incubated until day 5. Women with estradiol levels of <2000 pmol/L on the day of HCG injection were excluded. Cumulus cells were removed immediately after OPU in Group A and at 120 minutes after OPU in Group B. ICSI was performed with all mature oocytes, and fertilized oocytes were cultured to the blastocyst stage. Maturation, fertilization, blastocyst, good quality blastocyst, pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates were compared.

resultsThere were no significant differences in maturation, fertilization, blastocyst, pregnancy, live birth, or miscarriage rates between Groups A and B. However, the percentage of good quality blastocysts was significantly higher in Group B than Group A (52.0% vs 33.1%).

conclusionsIntact cumulus cells should be maintained during the preincubation period, as they are important to embryonic development after fertilization.

Indexed as

cumulus cells removalcytoplasmic maturationoocyte denudationoocyte maturitypreincubation

Identifiers

PMID30655729
PMCPMC6332823
OpenAlexW2901511752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.