Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30655720›Full record

ReviewReproductive medicine and biology2019

Deciphering the effect of reproductive tract microbiota on human reproduction.

Inmaculada Moreno, Carlos Simon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproductive medicine and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Nutrients · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Progress in interventions for vaginal microecology.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Mechanism of Endometrial Receptivity Affected by Fibroids.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Inmaculada MorenoIgenomix Foundation Parque Tecnologico de Paterna Valencia Spain.
Carlos SimonIgenomix Foundation Parque Tecnologico de Paterna Valencia Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0902-9531

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe female reproductive tract contains an active microbiome comprising mainly bacteria from the

methodsCurrent literature covering the reproductive tract microbiome is summarized and contextualized in this review. MAIN

findingsThis review presents the current knowledge about the bacterial composition of the lower and upper reproductive tract as well as the impact of the microbiota on women's health and reproduction. We place special focus on the impact of the endometrial microbiome in infertility and assisted reproductive technologies.

conclusionThe assessment of the reproductive tract microbiome adds a new microbiological perspective to human reproduction, pregnancy, and onset of new life, highlighting the importance of considering the evaluation of microbial communities to improve personalized care in reproductive medicine and women's health.

Indexed as

dysbiosisendometrial healthhuman reproductionmicrobiomereproductive tract bacteria

Identifiers

PMID30655720
PMCPMC6332752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.