Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30655687›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2019

Physical functioning and mindfulness skills training in chronic pain: a systematic review.

William Jackson, Emily L Zale, Stanley J Berman, Alberto Malacarne, Amy Lapidow, Michael E Schatman, Ronald Kulich, Ana-Maria Vranceanu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mindfulness and Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: An Umbrella Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

William JacksonDepartment of Diagnostic Sciences, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA, william_c.jackson@tufts.edu.
Emily L ZaleDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard School of Medicine, MA, USA.
Stanley J BermanDepartment of Clinical Health Psychology, William James College, MA, USA.
Alberto MalacarneDepartment of Diagnostic Sciences, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA, william_c.jackson@tufts.edu.
Amy LapidowDepartment of Health Sciences Library, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael E SchatmanDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Ronald KulichDepartment of Diagnostic Sciences, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA, william_c.jackson@tufts.edu.
Ana-Maria VranceanuDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard School of Medicine, MA, USA.
Tufts University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USWilliam James College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe importance of improved physical function as a primary outcome in the treatment of chronic pain is widely accepted. There have been limited attempts to assess the effects mindfulness skills training (MST) has on objective outcomes in chronic pain care.

methodsThis systematic review evaluated published reports of original randomized controlled trials that described physical function outcomes after MST in the chronic pain population and met methodological quality according to a list of predefined criteria. PRISMA criteria were used to identify and select studies, and assess their eligibility for inclusion. The established guidelines for best practice of systematic reviews were followed to report the results.

resultsOf the 2,818 articles identified from the original search of four electronic databases, inclusionary criteria were met by 15 studies published as of August 10, 2015, totaling 1,199 patients. All included studies used self-report measures of physical function, and only two studies also employed performance-based measures of function. There were wide variations in how physical function was conceptualized and measured. Although the quality of the studies was rated as high, there was inconclusive evidence for improvement in physical function assessed by self-report due to contradiction in individual study findings and the measures used to assess function. Strong evidence for lack of improvement in physical function assessed via performance-based measures was found.

conclusionThis review draws attention to the importance of having a unified approach to how physical function is conceptualized and assessed, as well as the importance of using quality performance-based measures in addition to subjective self-reports that appropriately assess the physical function construct within MSTs for chronic pain.

Indexed as

activity trackerschronic painmindfulnessoutcome measuresphysical functioningsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30655687
PMCPMC6322706
OpenAlexW2906723176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.