Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30655549›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Central place foragers select ocean surface convergent features despite differing foraging strategies.

Matthew J Oliver, Josh T Kohut, Kim Bernard, William Fraser, Peter Winsor, Hank Statscewich, Erick Fredj, Megan Cimino, Donna Patterson-Fraser, Filipa Carvalho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matthew J OliverUniversity of Delaware, College of Earth, Ocean and Environment, 700 Pilottown Road, Lewes, DE, 19958, USA.
Josh T KohutRutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Department of Marine and Coastal Sciences, 71 Dudley Road, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA. kohut@marine.rutgers.edu.
Kim BernardOregon State University, College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, 104 CEOAS Admin Bldg, Corvallis, OR, 97330, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0509-2744
William FraserPolar Oceans Research Group, P.O. Box 368, Sheridan, MT, 59749, USA.
Peter WinsorUniversity of Alaska, Fairbanks, College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, 905 Koyukuk Dr. Suite 245 O'Neill Bldg., Fairbanks, AK, 99775-7220, USA.
Hank StatscewichUniversity of Alaska, Fairbanks, College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, 905 Koyukuk Dr. Suite 245 O'Neill Bldg., Fairbanks, AK, 99775-7220, USA.
Erick FredjThe Jerusalem College of Technology, Computer Science Department, 21 Havaad Haleumi St., P.O. Box 16031, Jerusalem, 91160, Israel.
Megan CiminoScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, Coastal Observing R&D Center, 9500 Gilman Drive #0214, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Donna Patterson-FraserPolar Oceans Research Group, P.O. Box 368, Sheridan, MT, 59749, USA.
Filipa CarvalhoNational Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8355-4329

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovering the predictors of foraging locations can be challenging, and is often the critical missing piece for interpreting the ecological significance of observed movement patterns of predators. This is especially true in dynamic coastal marine systems, where planktonic food resources are diffuse and must be either physically or biologically concentrated to support upper trophic levels. In the Western Antarctic Peninsula, recent climate change has created new foraging sympatry between Adélie (Pygoscelis adeliae) and gentoo (P. papua) penguins in a known biological hotspot near Palmer Deep canyon. We used this recent sympatry as an opportunity to investigate how dynamic local oceanographic features affect aspects of the foraging ecology of these two species. Simulated particle trajectories from measured surface currents were used to investigate the co-occurrence of convergent ocean features and penguin foraging locations. Adélie penguin diving activity was restricted to the upper mixed layer, while gentoo penguins often foraged much deeper than the mixed layer, suggesting that Adélie penguins may be more responsive to dynamic surface convergent features compared to gentoo penguins. We found that, despite large differences in diving and foraging behavior, both shallow-diving Adélie and deeper-diving gentoo penguins strongly selected for surface convergent features. Furthermore, there was no difference in selectivity for shallow- versus deep-diving gentoo penguins. Our results suggest that these two mesopredators are selecting surface convergent features, however, how these surface signals are related to subsurface prey fields is unknown.

Identifiers

PMID30655549
PMCPMC6336854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.