ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2019
Silicon carbide X-ray beam position monitors for synchrotron applications.
Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- SiC resistive X-ray beam monitor for intensity and position control of synchrotron light.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2026Article
- Transient Charge Collection in Ultra-Thin SiC Membranes for Single-Ion Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ultra-thin (<2 µm) silicon carbide free-standing membranes as beam position monitors for soft and tender X-ray beamlines.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2025Article
- SiC free-standing membrane for X-ray intensity monitoring in synchrotron radiation beamlines.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2025Article
- In situ/operando method for energy stability measurement of synchrotron radiation.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2024Article
- Single-Ion Counting with an Ultra-Thin-Membrane Silicon Carbide Sensor.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A direct experimental comparison of single-crystal CVD diamond and silicon carbide X-ray beam position monitors.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2023Article
- Emerging SiC Applications beyond Power Electronic Devices.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Radiation Hardness Study of Silicon Carbide Sensors under High-Temperature Proton Beam Irradiations.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Ultra-high dose rate dosimetry: Challenges and opportunities for FLASH radiation therapy.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Investigation of the Young's Modulus and the Residual Stress of 4H-SiC Circular Membranes on 4H-SiC Substrates.Micromachines · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, the performance of thin silicon carbide membranes as material for radiation hard X-ray beam position monitors (XBPMs) is investigated. Thermal and electrical behavior of XBPMs made from thin silicon carbide membranes and single-crystal diamond is compared using finite-element simulations. Fabricated silicon carbide devices are also compared with a 12 µm commercial polycrystalline diamond XBPM at the Swiss Light Source at the Paul Scherrer Institute. Results show that silicon carbide devices can reach equivalent transparencies while showing improved linearity, dynamics and signal-to-noise ratio compared with commercial polycrystalline diamond XBPMs. Given the obtained results and availability of electronic-grade epitaxies on up to 6 inch wafers, it is expected that silicon carbide can substitute for diamond in most beam monitoring applications, whereas diamond, owing to its lower absorption, could remain the material of choice in cases of extreme X-ray power densities, such as pink and white beams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.