Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30655376›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2019

Epigenomic profiling of myelofibrosis reveals widespread DNA methylation changes in enhancer elements and

Nicolás Martínez-Calle, Marien Pascual, Raquel Ordoñez, Edurne San José Enériz, Marta Kulis, Estíbaliz Miranda, Elisabeth Guruceaga, Víctor Segura, María José Larráyoz, Beatriz Bellosillo and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. JAK2V617FMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Epigenetic Dysregulation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolás Martínez-CalleÁrea de Hemato-Oncología, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, IDISNA, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona.
Marien PascualÁrea de Hemato-Oncología, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, IDISNA, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona.
Raquel OrdoñezÁrea de Hemato-Oncología, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, IDISNA, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona.
Edurne San José EnérizÁrea de Hemato-Oncología, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, IDISNA, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona.
Marta KulisFundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica, Barcelona.
Estíbaliz MirandaÁrea de Hemato-Oncología, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, IDISNA, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona.
Elisabeth GuruceagaUnidad de Bioinformática, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona.
Víctor SeguraUnidad de Bioinformática, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona.
María José LarráyozCIMA Laboratory of Diagnostics, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona.
Beatriz BellosilloDepartmento de Patología, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona.
María José CalasanzCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid.
Carles BessesDepartmento de Hematología, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona.
José RifónCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid.
José I Martín-SuberoCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid.
Xabier AgirreÁrea de Hemato-Oncología, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, IDISNA, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona xaguirre@unav.es fprosper@unav.es.
Felipe ProsperÁrea de Hemato-Oncología, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, IDISNA, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona xaguirre@unav.es fprosper@unav.es.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer · ESUniversidad de Navarra · ESHospital Del Mar · ESConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESFundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study we interrogated the DNA methylome of myelofibrosis patients using high-density DNA methylation arrays. We detected 35,215 differentially methylated CpG, corresponding to 10,253 genes, between myelofibrosis patients and healthy controls. These changes were present both in primary and secondary myelofibrosis, which showed no differences between them. Remarkably, most differentially methylated CpG were located outside gene promoter regions and showed significant association with enhancer regions. This aberrant enhancer hypermethylation was negatively correlated with the expression of 27 genes in the myelofibrosis cohort. Of these, we focused on the

Indexed as

DNA MethylationApoptosisButyrate Response Factor 1Case-Control StudiesCell LineCell ProliferationEnhancer Elements, GeneticEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsGenes, Tumor SuppressorHumansPrimary MyelofibrosisButyrate Response Factor 1ZFP36L1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID30655376
PMCPMC6669145
OpenAlexW2908862505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.