Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30655110›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2019

Predictive Value of Duplex Ultrasound for Significant In-Stent Restenosis after Percutaneous Transluminal Renal Artery Stent Placement: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Yu Duan, Feixiang Xiang, Qian Li, Kaiwen Li, Joseph R Grajo, Anthony E Samir

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yu DuanDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Feixiang XiangDepartment of Ultrasound, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Qian LiDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Kaiwen LiDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Joseph R GrajoDivision of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Anthony E SamirDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: ASAMIR@mgh.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USSun Yat-sen University · CNUnion Hospital · CNUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Reducing Variability in Hepatic Shear Wave ElastographyK23EB020710 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SAMIR, ANTHONY EDWARD · 2016 to 2019
$781k
NIBIB NIH HHS K23 EB020710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the value of pre-stenting and early post-stenting (<1 mo) duplex ultrasound parameters in predicting significant in-stent restenosis (ISR), we matched significant ISR patients 1:1 with controls without ISR in pre-stenting and early post-stenting (<1 mo) periods, respectively, using propensity score matching. Duplex ultrasound parameters, such as renal length difference between non-lesion side and lesion side within patient, trans-lesion peak systolic velocity and renal aortic ratio, were compared between cases and controls, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was charted to predict ISR. After propensity score matching, 28 cases were matched in the pre-stenting period and 16 cases in the early post-stenting time period. Pre-stenting renal length difference, early post-stenting peak systolic velocity and renal aortic ratio showed significant differences in case-control comparisons. Early post-stenting peak systolic velocity (AUROC: 0.826, cutoff: 141 cm/s) and renal aortic ratio (AUROC: 0.770, cutoff: 1.75) performed well in predicting significant ISR and may serve as non-invasive markers in ISR surveillance.

Indexed as

Prosthesis FailureStentsAgedFemaleHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsPropensity ScoreRecurrenceRenal ArteryRenal Artery ObstructionReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography, Doppler, DuplexDuplex ultrasoundPredictorPropensity score matchingRenal artery in-stent restenosis

Identifiers

PMID30655110
PMCPMC7580866
OpenAlexW2908993778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.