Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30655025›Full record

ArticleKidney international2019

Glomerular membrane attack complex is not a reliable marker of ongoing C5 activation in lupus nephritis.

Hannah R Wilson, Nicholas R Medjeral-Thomas, Alyssa C Gilmore, Pritesh Trivedi, Kathleen Seyb, Ramin Farzaneh-Far, Iva Gunnarsson, Agneta Zickert, Thomas D Cairns, Liz Lightstone and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Molecular and Cellular Mediators of Renal Fibrosis in Lupus Nephritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. The utility of CXCL13 and circulating CXCR5Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hannah R WilsonCentre for Inflammatory Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nicholas R Medjeral-ThomasCentre for Inflammatory Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alyssa C GilmoreCentre for Inflammatory Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Pritesh TrivediCentre for Inflammatory Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Kathleen SeybRa Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Ramin Farzaneh-FarRa Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Iva GunnarssonDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Agneta ZickertDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Thomas D CairnsCentre for Inflammatory Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Liz LightstoneCentre for Inflammatory Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
H Terence CookCentre for Inflammatory Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: t.h.cook@imperial.ac.uk.
Matthew C PickeringCentre for Inflammatory Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GBKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complement plays an important role in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis (LN). With the emergence of therapeutic complement inhibition, there is a need to identify patients in whom complement-driven inflammation is a major cause of kidney injury in LN. Clinical and histopathological data were obtained retrospectively from 57 biopsies with class III, IV, and V LN. Biopsies were stained for complement components C9, C5b-9, C3c, and C3d and for the macrophage marker CD68. C9 and C5b-9 staining were highly correlated (r = 0.92 in the capillary wall). C5b-9 staining was detected in the mesangium and/or capillary wall of both active and chronic proliferative LN in all but one biopsy and in the capillary wall of class V LN in all biopsies. C5b-9 staining intensity in the tubular basement membrane correlated with markers of tubulointerstitial damage, and more intense capillary wall C5b-9 staining was significantly associated with nonresponse to conventional treatment. Glomerular C5b-9 staining intensity did not differ between active and chronic disease; in contrast, C3c and CD68 staining were associated with active disease. Evaluation of serial biopsies and comparison of staining in active and chronic LN demonstrated that C5b-9 staining persisted for months to years. These results suggest that C5b-9 staining is almost always present in LN, resolves slowly, and is not a reliable marker of ongoing glomerular C5 activation. This limits the utility of C5b-9 staining to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from C5 inhibition.

Indexed as

Complement ActivationAdolescentAdultAgedBiomarkersBiopsyComplement C5Complement Membrane Attack ComplexFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKidney GlomerulusLupus NephritisMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionBiomarkersComplement C5Complement Membrane Attack ComplexImmunosuppressive Agentscomplementglomerulonephritisrenal pathologysystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID30655025
PMCPMC6389546
OpenAlexW2910074500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.