Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30654849›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2019

Histone deacetylase inhibitors exert anti-tumor effects on human adherent and stem-like glioma cells.

Halina Was, Sylwia K Krol, Dante Rotili, Antonello Mai, Bartosz Wojtas, Bozena Kaminska, Marta Maleszewska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. HDAC7: a promising target in cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Halina WasLaboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Neurobiology Center, The Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, 3 Pasteur Str, 02-093, Warsaw, Poland.
Sylwia K KrolLaboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Neurobiology Center, The Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, 3 Pasteur Str, 02-093, Warsaw, Poland.
Dante RotiliDepartment of Drug Chemistry and Technologies, Sapienza University of Roma, P.le A. Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Antonello MaiDepartment of Drug Chemistry and Technologies, Sapienza University of Roma, P.le A. Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Bartosz WojtasLaboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Neurobiology Center, The Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, 3 Pasteur Str, 02-093, Warsaw, Poland.
Bozena KaminskaLaboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Neurobiology Center, The Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, 3 Pasteur Str, 02-093, Warsaw, Poland.
Marta MaleszewskaLaboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Neurobiology Center, The Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, 3 Pasteur Str, 02-093, Warsaw, Poland. m.maleszewska@nencki.gov.pl.ORCID 0000-0001-8695-374X
Instytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. Marcelego Nenckiego · PLIstituto Pasteur · ITNational Academy of Medicine · USSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diagnosis of glioblastoma (GBM), a most aggressive primary brain tumor with a median survival of 14.6 months, carries a dismal prognosis. GBMs are characterized by numerous genetic and epigenetic alterations, affecting patient survival and treatment response. Epigenetic mechanisms are deregulated in GBM as a result of aberrant expression/activity of epigenetic enzymes, including histone deacetylases (HDAC) which remove acetyl groups from histones regulating chromatin accessibility. Nevertheless, the impact of class/isoform-selective HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) on glioma cells, including glioma stem cells, had not been systematically determined.

resultsComprehensive analysis of the public TCGA dataset revealed the increased expression of HDAC 1, 2, 3, and 7 in malignant gliomas. Knockdown of HDAC 1 and 2 in human GBM cells significantly decreased cell proliferation. We tested the activity of 2 new and 3 previously described HDACi with different class/isoform selectivity on human GBM cells. All tested compounds exerted antiproliferative properties on glioma cells. However, the HDACi 1 and 4 blocked proliferation of glioblastoma cells leading to G2/M growth arrest without affecting astrocyte survival. Moreover, 1 and 4 at low micromolar concentrations displayed cytotoxic and antiproliferative effects on sphere cultures enriched in glioma stem cells.

conclusionsWe identified two selective HDAC inhibitors that blocked proliferation of glioblastoma cells, but did not affect astrocyte survival. These new and highly effective inhibitors should be considered as promising candidates for further investigation in preclinical GBM models.

Indexed as

BenzamidesBrain NeoplasmsCell AdhesionCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalDNA MethylationDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorEpigenesis, GeneticGliomaHistone Deacetylase 1Histone Deacetylase 2Histone Deacetylase 3Histone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesHumansBenzamidesHDAC1 protein, humanHDAC2 protein, humanHDAC7 protein, humanHistone Deacetylase 1Histone Deacetylase 2Histone Deacetylase 3Histone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesmocetinostatPyrimidinesCell proliferationEpigenetic drugsGlioblastomaGlioma stem cellsHDAC inhibitorsHistone deacetylase

Identifiers

PMID30654849
PMCPMC6337817
OpenAlexW2912602884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.