Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30654842›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2019

Medical students' preferences towards learning resources and their study habits at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Tahir Jameel, Zohair Jamil Gazzaz, Mukhtiar Baig, Jawad Mansoor Tashkandi, Nasser Saleh Alharenth, Nadeem Shafique Butt, Ansar Shafique, Rahila Iftikhar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Exploring the Informal Learning Resources Used by Dental Students: A Mixed Method.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tahir JameelDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. tjahmed@kau.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4557-7893
Zohair Jamil GazzazDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mukhtiar BaigDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry/Medical Educationist, Faculty of Medicine, Rabigh, KAU, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Jawad Mansoor TashkandiFaculty of Medicine, Rabigh, KAU, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Nasser Saleh AlharenthFaculty of Medicine, Rabigh, KAU, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Nadeem Shafique ButtDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Rabigh, KAU, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ansar ShafiqueDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Rabigh, KAU, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Rahila IftikharDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Rabigh, KAU, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
University of Jeddah · SAKing Abdulaziz University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of the present study was to explore why our medical students are avoiding the study of professional textbooks. We conducted this study from 10th March to 15th May 2017 at the King Abdulaziz University (KAU), Jeddah, to investigate their preferences towards learning resources, their study habits and correlation of academic achievements as a result of these trends. A questionnaire was provided as a web link. The participants of the study included medical students and data was analyzed on SPSS-Version 21.

resultsA total of 347/500 medical students participated in the study. Among our participants, there were 123 (35.5%) males and 224 (64.6%) were females. Female students' spent most of their time reading textbooks as compared to males (P-value = 0.001). Males mostly preferred the lecture handouts provided by their teachers. One-third of students admitted that, due to lack of a good grasp of English, they do not readily understand textbooks and consequently 67 (19.3%) students' showed a lack of interest in textbooks. Majority of the males 103 (84%) spent twice a time (66 vs. 33%) watching television as compared to the females. WhatsApp and Facebook kept both the sexes busy in most of their spare time.

Indexed as

Academic SuccessChoice BehaviorHabitsLearningTeaching MaterialsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSaudi ArabiaSex FactorsStudents, MedicalTextbooks as TopicYoung AdultMedical studentsStudy habitsTextbooks

Identifiers

PMID30654842
PMCPMC6335830
OpenAlexW2917489035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.