Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30654790›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2019

Exam preparatory course for the 2nd part of the German medical examination in obstetrics and gynecology - a potential tool for the recruitment of new residents during the occupational decision process before the practical year?

Fabian Riedel, Maximilian Riedel, Alexander Freis, Joerg Heil, Michael Golatta, Florian Schuetz, Christof Sohn, André Hennigs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fabian RiedelDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Maximilian RiedelDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander FreisDepartment of Gynecologic Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Joerg HeilDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael GolattaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Florian SchuetzDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christof SohnDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
André HennigsDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. andre.hennigs@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe "Second Stage of the Physician Exam" at the end of the 5th year of medical school in Germany is the final step before the "Practical Year." An exam preparatory class can cover the complete content of Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN) in two days. We raise the question of whether such training might promote students' interest in the given specialty during occupational decision making and whether it could even be used by hospitals as a recruitment tool. This investigation is even more important in the context of fierce competition among young professionals at clinics and in different specialties.

methodsWe conducted a multimodal course evaluation for four exam preparatory courses (each of which lasted two days and involved 8.5 h of teaching), including pre- and post-course tests with 20 multiple-choice questions to quantify the level of skill gain. Additionally, a standardized evaluation of course satisfaction was performed, followed by a post-exam questionnaire that dealt with studying activities and individual professional objectives.

resultsOverall, n = 197 students took part in four identical courses. Among them, n = 121 completed the pre-/post-course tests, n = 170 completed the evaluation, and n = 110 completed the post-exam questionnaire. An average improvement from 13.9 to 17.2 correct answers was observed (max. 20; pre-/post-difference 95%-CI: [2.77; 3.86], t-test: p < 0.0001). By trend, the students noted that course participation positively influenced their later choice of specialty training (m = 3.63; scale 1 = "strongly disagree," 5 = "strongly agree").

conclusionsIn addition to self-studying, condensed classroom training is effective and reasonable and might also increase the attractivity of OB/GYN among students and have a positive effect on recruitment.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceInternship and ResidencyPhysiciansStudents, MedicalEducational MeasurementGermanyGynecologyHumansObstetricsPersonnel SelectionPilot ProjectsSchools, MedicalExam preparation courseObstetrics and gynecologyOccupational decision processRecruitment

Identifiers

PMID30654790
PMCPMC6335710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.