Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30654584›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Expanding the Genetic Code for Site-Directed Spin-Labeling.

Theresa Braun, Malte Drescher, Daniel Summerer

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genetic Code Expansion: Another Solution to Codon Assignments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Paramagnetic NMR in drug discovery.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Theresa BraunDepartment of Chemistry and Konstanz Research School Chemical Biology (KoRS-CB), University of Konstanz, Universitätsstraße 10, 78457 Konstanz, Germany. theresa.braun@uni-konstanz.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2065-5840
Malte DrescherDepartment of Chemistry and Konstanz Research School Chemical Biology (KoRS-CB), University of Konstanz, Universitätsstraße 10, 78457 Konstanz, Germany. malte.drescher@uni-konstanz.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3571-3452
Daniel SummererFaculty of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, TU Dortmund University, Otto-Hahn-Straße 4a, 44227 Dortmund, Germany. daniel.summerer@uni-dortmund.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3019-7241

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 189682160European Research Council SPICE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Site-directed spin labeling (SDSL) in combination with electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy enables studies of the structure, dynamics, and interactions of proteins in the noncrystalline state. The scope and analytical value of SDSL⁻EPR experiments crucially depends on the employed labeling strategy, with key aspects being labeling chemoselectivity and biocompatibility, as well as stability and spectroscopic properties of the resulting label. The use of genetically encoded noncanonical amino acids (ncAA) is an emerging strategy for SDSL that holds great promise for providing excellent chemoselectivity and potential for experiments in complex biological environments such as living cells. We here give a focused overview of recent advancements in this field and discuss their potentials and challenges for advancing SDSL⁻EPR studies.

Indexed as

Genetic CodeSpin LabelsAmino AcidsCatalysisCycloaddition ReactionAmino AcidsSpin Labelsbioorthogonal chemistryEPR spectroscopymacromolecular dynamicsnoncanonical amino acidsprotein conformationspin labeling

Identifiers

PMID30654584
PMCPMC6359334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.