Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30654526›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

Understanding Barriers and Enablers to State Action on Salt: Analysis of Stakeholder Perceptions of the VicHealth Salt Reduction Partnership.

Briar McKenzie, Kathy Trieu, Carley A Grimes, Jenny Reimers, Jacqui Webster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Characterisation of At-Scale Community Health Interventions Aimed to Improve Healthy Eating Behaviour in Australia: A Rapid Review.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Briar McKenzieThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia. bmckenzie@georgeinstitute.org.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6972-6617
Kathy TrieuThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia. ktrieu@georgeinstitute.org.au.ORCID 0000-0003-1848-2741
Carley A GrimesInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia. carley.grimes@deakin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9123-1888
Jenny ReimersThe Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (VicHealth), Melbourne VIC 3053, Australia. jreimers@vichealth.vic.gov.au.
Jacqui WebsterThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia. jwebster@georgeinstitute.org.au.ORCID 0000-0003-3513-3340

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Victorian Salt Reduction Partnership (VicSalt Partnership) was launched in 2015, bringing together health and research organisations to develop an action plan for salt reduction interventions at a state level. A comprehensive evaluation was designed to assess the impact of the resulting four-year intervention strategy. As part of the process evaluation, semi-structured interviews were undertaken with stakeholders in March⁻May 2017, to understand perceived barriers and enablers to effective strategy implementation. Data were coded in relation to the key topic areas of the interviews with an inductive method used to analyse themes within topics. Seventeen stakeholders were contacted, 14 completed an interview; five from state government or statutory agencies, four from non-government funded organisations, four from research organisations and one from the food industry. Twelve were members of the VicSalt Partnership and two were informal collaborators. Most stakeholders viewed the VicSalt Partnership as a positive example of working collaboratively, and said this was essential for raising awareness of the importance of salt reduction with consumers, the food industry, and the government. Challenges relating to engaging the food industry and federal government through a state-led initiative were identified. New approaches to overcome this, such as forming clear "asks" to government and committing industry to "pledges" on reformulation were suggested. Stakeholder interviews and qualitative analysis have provided a range of important insights into barriers and enablers, many of which have already been used to strengthen intervention implementation. The evaluation of the VicSalt Partnership is ongoing and the program is expected to provide a wealth of lessons for state-led interventions to reduce salt intake in Australia and globally.

Indexed as

Diet, Sodium-RestrictedHealth PromotionStakeholder ParticipationAustraliaFood IndustryHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PolicyHumansSodium Chloride, DietarySodium Chloride, Dietarydisease preventionhypertensionpopulation interventionspublic health nutritionsodium reductionstakeholder perceptions

Identifiers

PMID30654526
PMCPMC6356996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.