Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30654346›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2019

Modeling the binding and diffusion of receptor-targeted nanoparticles topically applied on fresh tissue specimens.

Soyoung Kang, Xiaochun Xu, Eric Navarro, Yu Wang, Jonathan T C Liu, Kenneth M Tichauer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rational nanoparticle design: Optimization using insights from experiments and mathematical models.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Perspective on Fluorescent Nanodiamond Bioimaging.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Soyoung KangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1022-9648
Xiaochun XuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616, United States of America.
Eric NavarroDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616, United States of America.
Yu WangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1170-0008
Jonathan T C LiuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, United States of America.
Kenneth M TichauerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1667-3026
Illinois Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Endoscopic molecular imaging of esophageal cancer with multiplexed Raman nanopartR21EB015016 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LIU, JONATHAN T.C. · 2013 to 2014
$493k
Kinetic modeling of multiplexed SERS nanoparticles for quantitative molecular phenotyping (QMP) of breast cancerR21CA215561 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LIU, JONATHAN T.C. · 2017 to 2018
$358k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA215561NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB015016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoparticle (NP) contrast agents targeted to cancer biomarkers are increasingly being engineered for the early detection of cancer, guidance of therapy, and monitoring of response. There have been recent efforts to topically apply biomarker-targeted NPs on tissue surfaces to image the expression of cell-surface receptors over large surface areas as a means of evaluating tumor margins to guide wide local excision surgeries. However, diffusion and nonspecific binding of the NPs present challenges for relating NP retention on the tissue surface with the expression of cancer cell receptors. Paired-agent methods that employ a secondary 'control' NP to account for these nonspecific effects can improve cancer detection. Yet these paired-agent methods introduce multidimensional complexity (with tissue staining, rinsing, imaging, and data analysis protocols all being subject to alteration), and could be greatly simplified with accurate, predictive in silico models of NP binding and diffusion. Here, we outline and validate such a model to predict the diffusion, as well as specific and nonspecific binding, of targeted and control NPs topically applied on tissue surfaces. In order to inform the model, in vitro experiments were performed to determine relevant NP diffusion and binding rate constants in tissues. The predictive capacity of the model was validated by comparing simulated distributions of various sizes of NPs in comparison with experimental results. The regression of predicted and experimentally measured concentration-depth profiles yielded  <15% error (compared to ~70% error obtained using a previous model of NP diffusion and binding).

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdministration, TopicalDiffusionHumansKineticsNanoparticlesProtein BindingReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID30654346
PMCPMC7444409
OpenAlexW2911203574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.