Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30654077›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology2019

Poor prognosis for thin ulcerated melanomas and implications for a more aggressive approach to treatment.

Makenzie L Hawkins, Matthew J Rioth, Megan M Eguchi, Myles Cockburn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Makenzie L HawkinsUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Matthew J RiothUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado; Department of Medicine-Biomedical Informatics and Personalized Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Megan M EguchiUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Myles CockburnUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado; Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado; Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Department of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: myles.cockburn@ucdenver.edu.

Funding

University of Colorado Cancer Center Support Grant - Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts with Autologous Human Immune SystemsP30CA046934 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI James V Degregori · 1988 to 2026
$117.0M
An innovative, curriculum-based integrated sun exposure behavior intervention forR01CA158407 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI COCKBURN, MYLES G · 2012 to 2015
$2.5M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP003862NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000034CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000035CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000035INCI NIH HHS P30 CA046934NCI NIH HHS R01 CA158407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical guidelines for the treatment of melanoma are based largely on the behavior of thicker tumors. As a result, little is known about survival differences among patients with thinner tumors.

objectiveTo investigate the variability in survival for American Joint Committee on Cancer stage T1 thin melanoma tumors, defined as tumors less than 1 mm thick at diagnosis.

methodsThis population-based series included 43,008 non-Hispanic whites in whom cutaneous melanoma was diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 from the California Cancer Registry. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate risk of death.

resultsSurvival for patients with thin ulcerated tumors was comparable to that for patients with stage II tumors, who are currently treated more aggressively. At 12 months, patients with thin ulcerated tumors had approximately 6% lower survival (92.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 90.6%-93.9%]) compared with patients with thin nonulcerated tumors (98.2% [95% CI, 98.0%-98.3%]). At 24 months, this survival difference increased (85.2% [95% CI, 82.8%-87.4%] vs 96.1% [95% CI, 95.8-96.3%] for those with thin ulcerated and thin nonulcerated tumors, respectively) and a greater than 15% survival difference was seen at 60 months. LIMITATIONS: Previous reports of cancer registry data have noted some evidence of miscoding of thin tumors.

conclusionThe poorer survival in patients with ulcerated tumors less than 1 mm thick implies the need for additional studies to determine potential benefits of more aggressive treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCaliforniaChildCombined Modality TherapyCutaneous Malignant MelanomaFemaleHumansImmunotherapyKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessAntineoplastic Agentsmelanomastagingsurvivaltumor thickness

Identifiers

PMID30654077
PMCPMC7232854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.