ArticleResearch in gerontological nursing2019
Measurement Challenges in Research With Individuals With Cognitive Impairment.
Article in Research in gerontological nursing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Association of metformin use and nutritional status with cognitive frailty in older adults with type 2 diabetes.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Gaps in Population Life Course Phenotype Trajectories Underlying Major Noncommunicable Diseases: A Scoping Review.International journal of population data science · 2026Article
- Diagnosing recurring explanatory gaps and proposing a mechanism-based psychoeducational framework in Islamic-tradition long-term care: a model informed by the moral exemplarity of the prophet Muhammad.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: molecular subtypes and emerging CNS-directed precision therapies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Consensus statement on exploring the Nexus between nutrition, brain health and dementia prevention.Nutrition & metabolism · 2025Review
- Article
- Multidimensional digital biomarker phenotypes for mild cognitive impairment: considerations for early identification, diagnosis and monitoring.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Integrating Neuroimaging Measures in Nursing Research.Biological research for nursing · 2023Review
- Perspectives on the measurement of self-perceived cognitive function in older adults.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This State of the Science Commentary responds to the preliminary recommendation from the National Research Summit on Dementia Care, Services and Supports for Persons with Dementia and Their Caregivers to develop and identify a broad array of outcome measures (objective and subjective) that are meaningful to different stakeholders. Five significant measurement challenges that nurse scientists confront when conducting research with individuals with cognitive impairment are presented: (a) assessment of subjective memory complaints; (b) validity of self-report; (c) ecological validity of cognitive performance measures; (d) use of biomarkers (neuroimaging) for describing the biological dynamics of symptoms; and (e) effect of high variability in measurement on statistical significance. Methods for addressing these challenges are offered. [Res Gerontol Nurs. 2019; 12(1):7-15.].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.