Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30653612›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Relative cerebral flow from dynamic PIB scans as an alternative for FDG scans in Alzheimer's disease PET studies.

Débora E Peretti, David Vállez García, Fransje E Reesink, Tim van der Goot, Peter P De Deyn, Bauke M de Jong, Rudi A J O Dierckx, Ronald Boellaard

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Quantitative Measurement of Tau Burden in a Dual-Time-Window Dynamic PET Imaging Protocol with [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Evaluation of early-phaseJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Early-phaseEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Measurement of Cerebral Perfusion Indices from the Early Phase of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Early-phaseJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Dynamic Amyloid PET: Relationships toJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Débora E PerettiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3033-8817
David Vállez GarcíaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Fransje E ReesinkDepartment of Neurology, Alzheimer Research Centre, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Tim van der GootDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Peter P De DeynDepartment of Neurology, Alzheimer Research Centre, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2228-2964
Bauke M de JongDepartment of Neurology, Alzheimer Research Centre, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rudi A J O DierckxDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ronald BoellaardDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Alzheimer's Disease (AD) dual-tracer positron emission tomography (PET) studies with 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) and 11C-labelled Pittsburgh Compound B (PIB) are used to assess metabolism and cerebral amyloid-β deposition, respectively. Regional cerebral metabolism and blood flow (rCBF) are closely coupled, both providing an index for neuronal function. The present study compared PIB-derived rCBF, estimated by the ratio of tracer influx in target regions relative to reference region (R1) and early-stage PIB uptake (ePIB), to FDG scans. Fifteen PIB positive (+) patients and fifteen PIB negative (-) subjects underwent both FDG and PIB PET scans to assess the use of R1 and ePIB as a surrogate for FDG. First, subjects were classified based on visual inspection of the PIB PET images. Then, discriminative performance (PIB+ versus PIB-) of rCBF methods were compared to normalized regional FDG uptake. Strong positive correlations were found between analyses, suggesting that PIB-derived rCBF provides information that is closely related to what can be seen on FDG scans. Yet group related differences between method's distributions were seen as well. Also, a better correlation with FDG was found for R1 than for ePIB. Further studies are needed to validate the use of R1 as an alternative for FDG studies in clinical applications.

Indexed as

AgedAlzheimer DiseaseAniline CompoundsBrainCarbon RadioisotopesCase-Control StudiesCerebrovascular CirculationCognitive DysfunctionFemaleFluorine RadioisotopesFluorodeoxyglucose F18GlucoseHumansMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission Tomography2-(4'-(methylamino)phenyl)-6-hydroxybenzothiazoleAniline CompoundsCarbon-11Carbon RadioisotopesFluorine-18Fluorine RadioisotopesFluorodeoxyglucose F18GlucoseRadiopharmaceuticalsThiazoles

Identifiers

PMID30653612
PMCPMC6336325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.