Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30653606›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Improved and semi-automated reductive β-elimination workflow for higher throughput protein O-glycosylation analysis.

Maximilianos Kotsias, Radoslaw P Kozak, Richard A Gardner, Manfred Wuhrer, Daniel I R Spencer

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Revealing Glycosylation Patterns inJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2024
    Article
  2. Labeling of Mucin-TypeACS measurement science au · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Eliminative Oximation of O-Glycans from Mucins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. MALDI-2 for the Enhanced Analysis ofAnalytical chemistry · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maximilianos KotsiasLudger Ltd, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3417-782X
Radoslaw P KozakLudger Ltd, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
Richard A GardnerLudger Ltd, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
Manfred WuhrerLeiden University Medical Centre, Centre for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden, Netherlands.
Daniel I R SpencerLudger Ltd, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein O-glycosylation has shown to be critical for a wide range of biological processes, resulting in an increased interest in studying the alterations in O-glycosylation patterns of biological samples as disease biomarkers as well as for patient stratification and personalized medicine. Given the complexity of O-glycans, often a large number of samples have to be analysed in order to obtain conclusive results. However, most of the O-glycan analysis work done so far has been performed using glycoanalytical technologies that would not be suitable for the analysis of large sample sets, mainly due to limitations in sample throughput and affordability of the methods. Here we report a largely automated system for O-glycan analysis. We adapted reductive β-elimination release of O-glycans to a 96-well plate system and transferred the protocol onto a liquid handling robot. The workflow includes O-glycan release, purification and derivatization through permethylation followed by MALDI-TOF-MS. The method has been validated according to the ICH Q2 (R1) guidelines for the validation of analytical procedures. The semi-automated reductive β-elimination system enabled for the characterization and relative quantitation of O-glycans from commercially available standards. Results of the semi-automated method were in good agreement with the conventional manual in-solution method while even outperforming it in terms of repeatability. Release of O-glycans for 96 samples was achieved within 2.5 hours, and the automated data acquisition on MALDI-TOF-MS took less than 1 minute per sample. This largely automated workflow for O-glycosylation analysis showed to produce rapid, accurate and reliable data, and has the potential to be applied for O-glycan characterization of biological samples, biopharmaceuticals as well as for biomarker discovery.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutomationCattleGlycoproteinsGlycosylationHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansLimit of DetectionMucinsPolysaccharidesReproducibility of ResultsSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationSubmandibular GlandWorkflowGlycoproteinsMucinsPolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID30653606
PMCPMC6336230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.