Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30653586›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2019

Serum levels of miR-29, miR-122, miR-155 and miR-192 are elevated in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.

Sven H Loosen, Georg Lurje, Georg Wiltberger, Mihael Vucur, Alexander Koch, Jakob N Kather, Pia Paffenholz, Frank Tacke, Florian T Ulmer, Christian Trautwein and 3 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Loss of miR-122 promotes cell migration and poor prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  4. Cholangiocarcinoma 2026: status quo, unmet needs and priorities.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Cholangiocarcinoma: The era of liquid biopsy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Molecular Biomarkers in Cholangiocarcinoma: Focus on Bile.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sven H LoosenDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Georg LurjeDepartment of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen Germany.
Georg WiltbergerDepartment of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen Germany.
Mihael VucurDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Hepatobiliary Oncology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Alexander KochDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Jakob N KatherDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Pia PaffenholzDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Frank TackeDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Florian T UlmerDepartment of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen Germany.
Christian TrautweinDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Tom LueddeDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Ulf P NeumannDepartment of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen Germany.
Christoph RoderburgDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2245-6362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCholangiocarcinoma (CCA) represents the second most common primary hepatic malignancy. Despite tremendous research activities, the prognosis for the majority of patients is still poor. Only in case of early diagnosis, liver resection might potentially lead to long-term survival. However, it is still unclear which patients benefit most from extensive liver surgery, highlighting the need for new diagnostic and prognostic stratification strategies.

methodsSerum concentrations of a 4 miRNA panel (miR-122, miR-192, miR-29b and miR-155) were analyzed using semi-quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR in serum samples from 94 patients with cholangiocarcinoma undergoing tumour resection and 40 healthy controls. Results were correlated with clinical data.

resultsSerum concentrations of miR-122, miR-192, miR-29b and miR-155 were significantly elevated in patients with CCA compared to healthy controls or patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis without malignant transformation. Although preoperative levels of these miRNAs were unsuitable as a prognostic marker of survival, a strong postoperative decline of miR-122 serum levels was significantly associated with a favorable patients' prognosis.

conclusionsAnalysis of circulating miRNAs represents a promising tool for the diagnosis of even early stage CCA. A postoperative decline in miRNA serum concentrations might be indicative for a favorable patients' outcome and helpful to identify patients with a good prognosis after extended liver surgery.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBile Duct NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesCholangiocarcinomaFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedPrognosisYoung AdultBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsMIRN122 microRNA, humanMIRN155 microRNA, humanMIRN192 microRNA, humanMIRN29a microRNA, human

Identifiers

PMID30653586
PMCPMC6336320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.